FEDERAL · 33 U.S.C. · Chapter 18
Discrimination against employees who bring proceedings; penalties; deposit of payments in special fund; civil actions; entitlement to restoration of employment and compensation, qualifications requirement; liability of employer for penalties and payments; insurance policy exemption from liability
33 U.S.C. § 948a
Title33 — Navigation and Navigable Waters
Chapter18 — LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION
This text of 33 U.S.C. § 948a (Discrimination against employees who bring proceedings; penalties; deposit of payments in special fund; civil actions; entitlement to restoration of employment and compensation, qualifications requirement; liability of employer for penalties and payments; insurance policy exemption from liability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
33 U.S.C. § 948a.
Text
It shall be unlawful for any employer or his duly authorized agent to discharge or in any other manner discriminate against an employee as to his employment because such employee has claimed or attempted to claim compensation from such employer, or because he has testified or is about to testify in a proceeding under this chapter. The discharge or refusal to employ a person who has been adjudicated to have filed a fraudulent claim for compensation is not a violation of this section. Any employer who violates this section shall be liable to a penalty of not less than $1,000 or more than $5,000, as may be determined by the deputy commissioner. All such penalties shall be paid to the deputy commissioner for deposit in the special fund as described in section 944 of this title, and if not paid
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Winters v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.
795 S.W.2d 723 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)
Billie J. Atkinson v. Gates, McDonald & Company
838 F.2d 808 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Nolting v. National Capital Group, Inc.
621 A.2d 1387 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Daniel Brink v. Continental Insurance Company
787 F.3d 1120 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. Sam A. Howard Director, Office of Workers Compensation Program, United States Department of Labor
904 F.2d 206 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
Francis v. Geddes, Jr. v. Benefits Review Board United States Department of Labor, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Intervenor
735 F.2d 1412 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Kirk J. Lesassier v. Chevron Usa, Inc.
776 F.2d 506 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Brian Sexton v. Panel Processing, Inc.
754 F.3d 332 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
Julianna Ellett Giant Food, Inc.
505 A.2d 888 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1986)
Newton v. Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd.
881 F.3d 1078 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Orel J. Ledet v. Phillips Petroleum Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
163 F.3d 901 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
General Dynamics Corporation v. Peter E. Horrigan and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor
848 F.2d 321 (First Circuit, 1988)
LaCour v. Lankford Co., Inc.
287 S.W.3d 105 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Palermo v. Letourneau Technologies, Inc.
542 F. Supp. 2d 499 (S.D. Mississippi, 2008)
Calvin Dickens v. Tidewater Stevedoring Corporation
656 F.2d 74 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
Greenberg v. New York City Transit Authority
851 N.E.2d 1135 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Hebert v. MID SOUTH CONTROLS AND SERV.
688 So. 2d 1171 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Reddy v. CASCADE GENERAL, INC.
206 P.3d 1070 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
Sickle v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC
653 F. App'x 763 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)
Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation v. Robert T. Nance
858 F.2d 182 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)
Source Credit
History
(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, §49, as added Pub. L. 92–576, §19, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1263; amended Pub. L. 98–426, §26, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1654.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Pub. L. 98–426 inserted after first sentence "The discharge or refusal to employ a person who has been adjudicated to have filed a fraudulent claim for compensation is not a violation of this section.", substituted "$1,000" for "$100", and substituted "$5,000" for "$1,000".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984, see section 28(e)(1) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note under section 901 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as an Effective Date of 1972 Amendment note under section 902 of this title.
Amendments
1984—Pub. L. 98–426 inserted after first sentence "The discharge or refusal to employ a person who has been adjudicated to have filed a fraudulent claim for compensation is not a violation of this section.", substituted "$1,000" for "$100", and substituted "$5,000" for "$1,000".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984, see section 28(e)(1) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note under section 901 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as an Effective Date of 1972 Amendment note under section 902 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 U.S.C. § 948a, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/33/948a.