FEDERAL · 33 U.S.C. · Chapter 18
Exclusiveness of liability
33 U.S.C. § 905
Title33 — Navigation and Navigable Waters
Chapter18 — LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION
This text of 33 U.S.C. § 905 (Exclusiveness of liability) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
33 U.S.C. § 905.
Text
(a)Employer liability; failure of employer to secure payment of compensation
The liability of an employer prescribed in section 904 of this title shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability of such employer to the employee, his legal representative, husband or wife, parents, dependents, next of kin, and anyone otherwise entitled to recover damages from such employer at law or in admiralty on account of such injury or death, except that if an employer fails to secure payment of compensation as required by this chapter, an injured employee, or his legal representative in case death results from the injury, may elect to claim compensation under the chapter, or to maintain an action at law or in admiralty for damages on account of such injury or death. In such action the defendant
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Victory Carriers, Inc. v. Law
404 U.S. 202 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Josephine Miskunas v. Union Carbide Corporation
399 F.2d 847 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)
Michael Riggs v. Scindia Steam Navigation Company and the Shipping Corporation of India
8 F.3d 1442 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Michael J. Ryan v. Pacific Coast Shipping Co., Liberia
509 F.2d 1054 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Kirk v. United States
124 F. Supp. 233 (D. Idaho, 1954)
George R. Stowers v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
985 F.2d 292 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)
Christoff v. Bergeron Industries, Inc.
474 So. 2d 999 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Summers v. Deutsche Seereederei Rostok Gmbh
469 S.E.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Poole v. Quality Shipyards, Inc.
668 So. 2d 411 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Holmes v. Daybrook Fisheries, Inc.
730 So. 2d 1006 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs
848 F.3d 115 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Juanita C. Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross v. Wilsco, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross
529 F.2d 457 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Kerr v. American Tugs of Venice, Inc.
522 So. 2d 190 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
Murray v. Gulfcoast Transit Co.
529 So. 2d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Orgeron v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
556 So. 2d 582 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1990)
Boudreaux v. Taylor Industries
672 So. 2d 995 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Ortega v. Semco, L.L.C.
762 So. 2d 276 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
Watson v. Third Shipmore Assoc
(Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Larrison v. Ocean Beauty Seafoods LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, §5, 44 Stat. 1426; Pub. L. 92–576, §18(a), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 98–426, §§4(b), 5(a)(1), (b), Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1641.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–426, §4(b), inserted at end "For purposes of this subsection, a contractor shall be deemed the employer of a subcontractor's employees only if the subcontractor fails to secure the payment of compensation as required by section 904 of this title."
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–426, §5(a)(1), substituted "If such person was employed to provide shipbuilding, repairing, or breaking services and such person's employer was the owner, owner pro hac vice, agent, operator, or charterer of the vessel, no such action shall be permitted, in whole or in part or directly or indirectly, against the injured person's employer (in any capacity, including as the vessel's owner, owner pro hac vice, agent, operator, or charterer) or against the employees of the employer" for "If such person was employed by the vessel to provide ship building or repair services, no such action shall be permitted if the injury was caused by the negligence of persons engaged in providing ship building or repair services to the vessel".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–426, §5(b), added subsec. (c).
1972—Pub. L. 92–576 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "the chapter" for "this chapter", and added subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by section 4(b) of Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984, and applicable both with respect to claims filed after Sept. 28, 1984, and to claims pending on that date, and amendment by section 5(a)(1), (b) of Pub. L. 98–426 applicable with respect to any injury after Sept. 28, 1984, see section 28(a), (c) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note under section 901 of this title.
Effective Date of 1972 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 92–576 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as a note under section 902 of this title.
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–426, §4(b), inserted at end "For purposes of this subsection, a contractor shall be deemed the employer of a subcontractor's employees only if the subcontractor fails to secure the payment of compensation as required by section 904 of this title."
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–426, §5(a)(1), substituted "If such person was employed to provide shipbuilding, repairing, or breaking services and such person's employer was the owner, owner pro hac vice, agent, operator, or charterer of the vessel, no such action shall be permitted, in whole or in part or directly or indirectly, against the injured person's employer (in any capacity, including as the vessel's owner, owner pro hac vice, agent, operator, or charterer) or against the employees of the employer" for "If such person was employed by the vessel to provide ship building or repair services, no such action shall be permitted if the injury was caused by the negligence of persons engaged in providing ship building or repair services to the vessel".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–426, §5(b), added subsec. (c).
1972—Pub. L. 92–576 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "the chapter" for "this chapter", and added subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by section 4(b) of Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984, and applicable both with respect to claims filed after Sept. 28, 1984, and to claims pending on that date, and amendment by section 5(a)(1), (b) of Pub. L. 98–426 applicable with respect to any injury after Sept. 28, 1984, see section 28(a), (c) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note under section 901 of this title.
Effective Date of 1972 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 92–576 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as a note under section 902 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 U.S.C. § 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/33/905.