FEDERAL · 33 U.S.C. · Chapter 10
Restrictions on tanker traffic in Puget Sound and adjacent waters
33 U.S.C. § 476
Title33 — Navigation and Navigable Waters
Chapter10 — ANCHORAGE GROUNDS AND HARBOR REGULATIONS GENERALLY
This text of 33 U.S.C. § 476 (Restrictions on tanker traffic in Puget Sound and adjacent waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
33 U.S.C. § 476.
Text
(a)The Congress finds that—
(1)the navigable waters of Puget Sound in the State of Washington, and the natural resources therein, are a fragile and important national asset;
(2)Puget Sound and the shore area immediately adjacent thereto is threatened by increased domestic and international traffic of tankers carrying crude oil in bulk which increases the possibility of vessel collisions and oil spills; and
(3)it is necessary to restrict such tanker traffic in Puget Sound in order to protect the navigable waters thereof, the natural resources therein, and the shore area immediately adjacent thereto, from environmental harm.
(b)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on and after October 18, 1977, no officer, employee, or other official of the Federal Government shall, or shall have
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
No Oilport! v. Carter
520 F. Supp. 334 (W.D. Washington, 1981)
Ocean Advocates v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
402 F.3d 846 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Ocean Advocates v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
167 F. Supp. 2d 1200 (W.D. Washington, 2001)
Ocean Advocates v. US Army
(Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–136, §5, Oct. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1168.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Bridge Permits
Pub. L. 112–213, title VII, §712(a), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1582, provided that:
"(a) In General.—For the purposes of reviewing a permit application pursuant to section 9 of the Act of March 3, 1899, popularly known as the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401), the Act of March 23, 1906, popularly known as the Bridge Act of 1906 (33 U.S.C. 491 et seq.), the Act of June 21, 1940, popularly known as the Truman-Hobbs Act (33 U.S.C. 511 et seq.), or the General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et seq.), the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating may—
"(1) accept voluntary services from one or more owners of a bridge; and
"(2) accept and credit to Coast Guard operating expenses any amounts received from one or more owners of a bridge."
Bridge Permits
Pub. L. 112–213, title VII, §712(a), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1582, provided that:
"(a) In General.—For the purposes of reviewing a permit application pursuant to section 9 of the Act of March 3, 1899, popularly known as the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401), the Act of March 23, 1906, popularly known as the Bridge Act of 1906 (33 U.S.C. 491 et seq.), the Act of June 21, 1940, popularly known as the Truman-Hobbs Act (33 U.S.C. 511 et seq.), or the General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et seq.), the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating may—
"(1) accept voluntary services from one or more owners of a bridge; and
"(2) accept and credit to Coast Guard operating expenses any amounts received from one or more owners of a bridge."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 U.S.C. § 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/33/476.