FEDERAL · 32 U.S.C. · Chapter 5

Participation in field exercises

32 U.S.C. § 503
Title32National Guard
Chapter5 — TRAINING

This text of 32 U.S.C. § 503 (Participation in field exercises) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
32 U.S.C. § 503.

Text

(a)(1) Under such regulations as the President may prescribe, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force, as the case may be, may provide for the participation of the National Guard in encampments, maneuvers, outdoor target practice, or other exercises for field or coast-defense instruction, independently of or in conjunction with the Army or the Air Force, or both.
(2)Paragraph (1) includes authority to provide for participation of the National Guard in conjunction with the Army or the Air Force, or both, in joint exercises for instruction to prepare the National Guard for response to civil emergencies and disasters.
(b)Amounts necessary for the pay, subsistence, transportation, and other proper expenses of any part of the National Guard of a State, the Commonwealth of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Egloff v. New Jersey Air National Guard
684 F. Supp. 1275 (D. New Jersey, 1988)
31 case citations
Phillips v. State, Dept. of Defense
486 A.2d 318 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
18 case citations
Estate of Burris v. State
759 A.2d 802 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2000)
10 case citations
Commonwealth v. Greenwood
508 A.2d 292 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
9 case citations
Allen - Key v. Nicholson
21 Vet. App. 54 (Veterans Claims, 2007)
8 case citations
Weyenberg Shoe Mfg. Co. v. Seidl
410 N.W.2d 604 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1987)
8 case citations
McManaway v. West
13 Vet. App. 60 (Veterans Claims, 1999)
6 case citations
Lucas v. Military Dept.
498 So. 2d 161 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
6 case citations
Kentucky National Guard v. Bayles
535 S.W.2d 234 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1976)
5 case citations
Spangler v. United States
185 F. Supp. 531 (S.D. Ohio, 1960)
5 case citations
Lee v. Yee
643 F. Supp. 593 (D. Hawaii, 1986)
4 case citations
McDermott v. United States
95 Fed. Cl. 70 (Federal Claims, 2010)
2 case citations
Baccus v. N.C. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety
671 S.E.2d 37 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
2 case citations
Gross v. United States
177 F. Supp. 766 (E.D. New York, 1959)
1 case citations
Matlack, Inc. v. Treadway
729 F. Supp. 1574 (S.D. West Virginia, 1990)
1 case citations
Opinion No. (1986)
(Missouri Attorney General Reports, 1986)
Carter v. United States
(D. Maryland, 2022)
Paul Stockwell v. Department of Homeland Security
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
DC v. Donald Trump
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
12-07 528
(Board of Veterans' Appeals, 2018)

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 610; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(b)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §517, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 309; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(b)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3441.)

Editorial Notes

In subsection (a), the words "the whole or any part" and "any part of" are omitted as surplusage. The word "Army" is substituted for the words "Regular Army", since the Army is the category that participates in the exercises, and the Regular Army is a personnel category only. Similarly, the words "Air Force" are used instead of the words "Regular Air Force".
In subsection (b), the words "Amounts necessary" are substituted for the words "such portion of said funds as may be necessary". The words "participating in an exercise under subsection (a)" are substituted for the words "as shall participate in such encampments, maneuvers, or other exercises, including outdoor target practice, for field and coast-defense instruction". The words "allocated to it from appropriations for field or coast-defense instruction" are substituted for the words "appropriated for that purpose and allocated to any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia".
In subsection (c), the words "Members of the National Guard participating in an exercise under subsection (a)" are substituted for the words "When any portion of the National Guard shall participate in encampments, maneuvers, or other exercises, including outdoor target practice, for field or coast-defense instruction, under the provisions of this title". The words "duly", "at any time", "rendezvous", "both dates inclusive", and "making the same" are omitted as surplusage.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands" for "State or Territory, Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia".
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–106 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–456 struck out "the Canal Zone," after "Puerto Rico,".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 U.S.C. § 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/32/503.