FEDERAL · 32 U.S.C. · Chapter 5
Participation in field exercises
32 U.S.C. § 503
Title32 — National Guard
Chapter5 — TRAINING
This text of 32 U.S.C. § 503 (Participation in field exercises) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
32 U.S.C. § 503.
Text
(a)(1) Under such regulations as the President may prescribe, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force, as the case may be, may provide for the participation of the National Guard in encampments, maneuvers, outdoor target practice, or other exercises for field or coast-defense instruction, independently of or in conjunction with the Army or the Air Force, or both.
(2)Paragraph (1) includes authority to provide for participation of the National Guard in conjunction with the Army or the Air Force, or both, in joint exercises for instruction to prepare the National Guard for response to civil emergencies and disasters.
(b)Amounts necessary for the pay, subsistence, transportation, and other proper expenses of any part of the National Guard of a State, the Commonwealth of
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Egloff v. New Jersey Air National Guard
684 F. Supp. 1275 (D. New Jersey, 1988)
Phillips v. State, Dept. of Defense
486 A.2d 318 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
Estate of Burris v. State
759 A.2d 802 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2000)
Commonwealth v. Greenwood
508 A.2d 292 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Allen - Key v. Nicholson
21 Vet. App. 54 (Veterans Claims, 2007)
Weyenberg Shoe Mfg. Co. v. Seidl
410 N.W.2d 604 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1987)
McManaway v. West
13 Vet. App. 60 (Veterans Claims, 1999)
Lucas v. Military Dept.
498 So. 2d 161 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Kentucky National Guard v. Bayles
535 S.W.2d 234 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1976)
Spangler v. United States
185 F. Supp. 531 (S.D. Ohio, 1960)
Lee v. Yee
643 F. Supp. 593 (D. Hawaii, 1986)
McDermott v. United States
95 Fed. Cl. 70 (Federal Claims, 2010)
Baccus v. N.C. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety
671 S.E.2d 37 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Gross v. United States
177 F. Supp. 766 (E.D. New York, 1959)
Matlack, Inc. v. Treadway
729 F. Supp. 1574 (S.D. West Virginia, 1990)
Opinion No. (1986)
(Missouri Attorney General Reports, 1986)
Carter v. United States
(D. Maryland, 2022)
Paul Stockwell v. Department of Homeland Security
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2023)
DC v. Donald Trump
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
12-07 528
(Board of Veterans' Appeals, 2018)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 610; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(b)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, §517, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 309; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(b)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3441.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the words "the whole or any part" and "any part of" are omitted as surplusage. The word "Army" is substituted for the words "Regular Army", since the Army is the category that participates in the exercises, and the Regular Army is a personnel category only. Similarly, the words "Air Force" are used instead of the words "Regular Air Force".
In subsection (b), the words "Amounts necessary" are substituted for the words "such portion of said funds as may be necessary". The words "participating in an exercise under subsection (a)" are substituted for the words "as shall participate in such encampments, maneuvers, or other exercises, including outdoor target practice, for field and coast-defense instruction". The words "allocated to it from appropriations for field or coast-defense instruction" are substituted for the words "appropriated for that purpose and allocated to any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia".
In subsection (c), the words "Members of the National Guard participating in an exercise under subsection (a)" are substituted for the words "When any portion of the National Guard shall participate in encampments, maneuvers, or other exercises, including outdoor target practice, for field or coast-defense instruction, under the provisions of this title". The words "duly", "at any time", "rendezvous", "both dates inclusive", and "making the same" are omitted as surplusage.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands" for "State or Territory, Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia".
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–106 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–456 struck out "the Canal Zone," after "Puerto Rico,".
In subsection (b), the words "Amounts necessary" are substituted for the words "such portion of said funds as may be necessary". The words "participating in an exercise under subsection (a)" are substituted for the words "as shall participate in such encampments, maneuvers, or other exercises, including outdoor target practice, for field and coast-defense instruction". The words "allocated to it from appropriations for field or coast-defense instruction" are substituted for the words "appropriated for that purpose and allocated to any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia".
In subsection (c), the words "Members of the National Guard participating in an exercise under subsection (a)" are substituted for the words "When any portion of the National Guard shall participate in encampments, maneuvers, or other exercises, including outdoor target practice, for field or coast-defense instruction, under the provisions of this title". The words "duly", "at any time", "rendezvous", "both dates inclusive", and "making the same" are omitted as surplusage.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands" for "State or Territory, Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia".
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–106 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–456 struck out "the Canal Zone," after "Puerto Rico,".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 U.S.C. § 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/32/503.