FEDERAL · 31 U.S.C. · Chapter 53
Reports on foreign currency transactions
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)Congress finds that—
(1)moving mobile capital can have a significant impact on the proper functioning of the international monetary system;
(2)it is important to have the most feasible current and complete information on the kind and source of capital flows, including transactions by large United States businesses and their foreign affiliates; and
(b)In this section, "United States person" and "foreign person controlled by a United States person" have the same meanings given those terms in section 7(f)(2)(A) and (C), respectively, of the Securities and Exchan
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
31 U.S.C. § 5315 (Reports on foreign currency transactions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Daniel F. Aversa, United States of America v. Vincent Mento, United States of America v. William J. Donovan
984 F.2d 493 (First Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Srivastava
540 F.3d 277 (Fourth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Krikor Baghdassar Tatoyan, A/K/A Krikor Tatoyan, United States of America v. Zenda Bedros Tatoyan, A/K/A Zenda Tatoyan
474 F.3d 1174 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Mark A. Simon
85 F.3d 906 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Cuban v. Securities & Exchange Commission
795 F. Supp. 2d 43 (District of Columbia, 2011)
United States v. Tatoyan
(Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Cuban v. Securities and Exchange Commission
(District of Columbia, 2011)
United States v. Raul Velasquez
991 F.2d 804 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 997.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a)(3), the words "it is desirable to emphasize this objective . . . existing legal" are omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (c), the words "(hereafter referred to as the 'Secretary')" are omitted because of the restatement. The words "under the authority of this subchapter and any other authority conferred by law" are omitted as surplus. The word "prescribe" is substituted for "supplement" for clarity. The words "the statement of findings under" and "the submission of" are omitted as surplus. The words "Reports required under this subchapter shall cover foreign currency transactions" are omitted because of the restatement. The words "such terms are" and "the policy of" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 5(b) of the Trading With the Enemy Act (50 App. U.S.C. 5(b)), referred to in subsec. (a)(3), is section 5(b) of act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, 40 Stat. 415, which was editorially transferred and is now classified to section 4305(b) of Title 50, War and National Defense.
In subsection (c), the words "(hereafter referred to as the 'Secretary')" are omitted because of the restatement. The words "under the authority of this subchapter and any other authority conferred by law" are omitted as surplus. The word "prescribe" is substituted for "supplement" for clarity. The words "the statement of findings under" and "the submission of" are omitted as surplus. The words "Reports required under this subchapter shall cover foreign currency transactions" are omitted because of the restatement. The words "such terms are" and "the policy of" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 5(b) of the Trading With the Enemy Act (50 App. U.S.C. 5(b)), referred to in subsec. (a)(3), is section 5(b) of act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, 40 Stat. 415, which was editorially transferred and is now classified to section 4305(b) of Title 50, War and National Defense.