FEDERAL · 31 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND PENALTIES
Adverse personnel actions
31 U.S.C. § 1349
Title31 — Money and Finance
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND PENALTIES
This text of 31 U.S.C. § 1349 (Adverse personnel actions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
31 U.S.C. § 1349.
Text
(a)An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government violating section 1341(a) or 1342 of this title shall be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including, when circumstances warrant, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office.
(b)An officer or employee who willfully uses or authorizes the use of a passenger motor vehicle or aircraft owned or leased by the United States Government (except for an official purpose authorized by section 1344 of this title) or otherwise violates section 1344 shall be suspended without pay by the head of the agency. The officer or employee shall be suspended for at least one month, and when circumstances warrant, for a longer period or summarily removed from office.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Fausto
484 U.S. 439 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Cornelius v. Nutt
472 U.S. 648 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Donald J. Devine v. Allison E. Nutt
718 F.2d 1048 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
Kevin R. Kimm v. Department of the Treasury
61 F.3d 888 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Daniel Moncada v. Executive Office of the President, Office of Administration
2022 MSPB 25 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Adams v. United States
40 Fed. Cl. 303 (Federal Claims, 1998)
Dejustice Coleman v. United States Secret Service
749 F.2d 726 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
Fausto v. United States
7 Cl. Ct. 459 (Court of Claims, 1985)
Sammie D. Felton v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
820 F.2d 391 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
Insurance Co. of North America v. District of Columbia
948 A.2d 1181 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)
Kornitzky Grp., LLC v. Elwell
912 F.3d 637 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
Baltimore v. Clinton
900 F. Supp. 2d 21 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Jones v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2020)
I.P. v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2020)
D.P. v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2020)
Richmond v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2020)
Baca v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2020)
Anello v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2020)
Abrantes v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2020)
1 v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 926.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the words "In addition to any penalty or liability under other law" are omitted as surplus. The words "District of Columbia government" are added because of section 47–105 of the D.C. Code.
In subsection (b), the words "of the Government" and "from duty" are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. The word "pay" is substituted for "compensation" for consistency. The word "agency" is substituted for "department" because of section 101 of the revised title and for consistency.
In subsection (b), the words "of the Government" and "from duty" are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. The word "pay" is substituted for "compensation" for consistency. The word "agency" is substituted for "department" because of section 101 of the revised title and for consistency.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 U.S.C. § 1349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/31/1349.