FEDERAL · 31 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND PENALTIES
Limitation on voluntary services
31 U.S.C. § 1342
Title31 — Money and Finance
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, AND PENALTIES
This text of 31 U.S.C. § 1342 (Limitation on voluntary services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
31 U.S.C. § 1342.
Text
An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not accept voluntary services for either government or employ personal services exceeding that authorized by law except for emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property. This section does not apply to a corporation getting amounts to make loans (except paid in capital amounts) without legal liability of the United States Government. As used in this section, the term "emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property" does not include ongoing, regular functions of government the suspension of which would not imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Daniel Trevino
7 F.4th 414 (Sixth Circuit, 2021)
Association of American Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. Clinton
997 F.2d 898 (D.C. Circuit, 1993)
United States v. State of Texas
97 F.4th 268 (Fifth Circuit, 2024)
PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,325 (Federal Claims, 1998)
Thurston v. United States
696 F. Supp. 680 (District of Columbia, 1988)
Air Transp. Ass'n of Am., Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin.
912 F.3d 642 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
People for the Ethical Treatment Animals v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.
912 F.3d 641 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
Kornitzky Grp., LLC v. Elwell
912 F.3d 637 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
Lundberg v. Merit Systems Protection Board
665 F. App'x 870 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Air Transport Association v. FAA (ORDER)
(D.C. Circuit, 2019)
Alicia Head v. David Steiner, Postmaster General of the United States
(M.D. Georgia, 2025)
M.R.Z. v. Commissioner of Social Security
(N.D. California, 2025)
Joseph O'Shaughnessy, et al. v. United States of America; Todd C. Engel v. United States of America
(D. Nevada, 2025)
Bair Vadimovich Mitupov v. Pamela Bondi, et al.
(W.D. Washington, 2025)
M.S.G.L., by and through her parents Gregorio Guzman Reyes and Maricruz Lopez Santos, and individually v. United States of America
(W.D. Washington, 2025)
JPM Restaurant, LLC v. United States of America
(E.D. Tennessee, 2025)
Mahnaz Malekpour Mansoorkhani v. Kristi Noem, et al.
(W.D. Washington, 2025)
Malika Kadyrov fka Kurbanova v. Kristi Noem, et al.
(W.D. Washington, 2025)
Sparks v. United States
(E.D. North Carolina, 2025)
Welch v. United States
(E.D. North Carolina, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 923; Pub. L. 101–508, title XIII, §13213(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–621; Pub. L. 104–92, title III, §310(a), Jan. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 20.)
Editorial Notes
The words "District of Columbia government" are added because of section 47–105 of the D.C. Code.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–92 temporarily amended section by inserting "All officers and employees of the United States Government or the District of Columbia government shall be deemed to be performing services relating to emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property." after first sentence and by striking out at end "As used in this section, the term 'emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property' does not include ongoing, regular functions of government the suspension of which would not imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property". See Effective and Termination Dates of 1996 Amendment note below.
1990—Pub. L. 101–508 inserted at end "As used in this section, the term 'emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property' does not include ongoing, regular functions of government the suspension of which would not imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective and Termination Dates of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–92, title III, §310(a), Jan. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 20, provided that the amendment made by that section is for the period Dec. 15, 1995, through Jan. 26, 1996.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–92 temporarily amended section by inserting "All officers and employees of the United States Government or the District of Columbia government shall be deemed to be performing services relating to emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property." after first sentence and by striking out at end "As used in this section, the term 'emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property' does not include ongoing, regular functions of government the suspension of which would not imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property". See Effective and Termination Dates of 1996 Amendment note below.
1990—Pub. L. 101–508 inserted at end "As used in this section, the term 'emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property' does not include ongoing, regular functions of government the suspension of which would not imminently threaten the safety of human life or the protection of property."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective and Termination Dates of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–92, title III, §310(a), Jan. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 20, provided that the amendment made by that section is for the period Dec. 15, 1995, through Jan. 26, 1996.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 U.S.C. § 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/31/1342.