FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 5

Alabama

28 U.S.C. § 81

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 81 (Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 81.

Text

Alabama is divided into three judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Middle, and Southern Districts of Alabama.

(a)The Northern District comprises five divisions.
(1)The Northwestern Division comprises the counties of Colbert, Franklin, Lauderdale, and Lawrence. Court for the Northwestern Division shall be held at Florence.
(2)The Northeastern Division comprises the counties of Cullman, Jackson, Limestone, Madison, Marshall, and Morgan. Court for the Northeastern Division shall be held at Huntsville.
(3)The Southern Division comprises the counties of Blount, Jefferson, and Shelby. Court for the Southern Division shall be held at Birmingham.
(4)The Eastern Division comprises the counties of Calhoun, Cherokee, Clay, Cleburne, DeKalb, Etowah, Saint Clair, and Talladega. Court fo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., Inc
319 U.S. 448 (Supreme Court, 1943)
281 case citations
Hooker v. Sivley
187 F.3d 680 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
94 case citations
Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. v. Igoe
212 F.2d 378 (Seventh Circuit, 1954)
49 case citations
Grivas v. Parmelee Transp. Co.
207 F.2d 334 (Seventh Circuit, 1953)
40 case citations
In Re Henderson
197 B.R. 147 (N.D. Alabama, 1996)
38 case citations
United States v. Robert E. Burns and Margaret Ann Green
662 F.2d 1378 (Eleventh Circuit, 1981)
33 case citations
Metlakatla Indian Community v. Egan
363 U.S. 555 (Supreme Court, 1960)
20 case citations
United States v. Edward v. Mase
556 F.2d 671 (Second Circuit, 1977)
20 case citations
Weinberg v. COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG, INCORPORATED
215 F. Supp. 633 (E.D. New York, 1963)
17 case citations
AFC Franchising, LLC v. Danilo Purugganan
43 F.4th 1285 (Eleventh Circuit, 2022)
11 case citations
Jefferson County v. Acker
92 F.3d 1561 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
10 case citations
Holmes v. Wallace
407 F. Supp. 493 (M.D. Alabama, 1976)
9 case citations
Lowe's OK'd Used Cars, Inc. v. Acceptance Insurance
995 F. Supp. 1388 (M.D. Alabama, 1998)
8 case citations
Bartronics, Inc. v. Power-One, Inc.
510 F. Supp. 2d 634 (S.D. Alabama, 2007)
7 case citations
Champ v. Seamans
330 F. Supp. 1127 (M.D. Alabama, 1971)
4 case citations
United States v. Monique Lozoya
982 F.3d 648 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
4 case citations
Hardin v. City of Gadsden
837 F. Supp. 1113 (N.D. Alabama, 1993)
4 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 873; Pub. L. 87–36, §3(a), May 19, 1961, 75 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 118–179, §1, Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2613.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. §142 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §70, 36 Stat. 1105; Feb. 28, 1913, ch. 89, 37 Stat. 698; June 27, 1922, ch. 247, 42 Stat. 667).
Provisions relating to the places for the maintenance of the clerks' offices were omitted as covered by section 751 of this title, providing that deputy clerks may be designated to reside and maintain offices at such places for holding court as the judge may determine.
Provisions that the offices of the court shall be kept open at all times were omitted as covered by section 452 of this title.
A provision requiring the district judge for the northern district to reside at Birmingham was omitted as incongruous with section 134 of this title, requiring every district judge to reside within the district for which he is appointed. Likewise the provision of section 142 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., requiring the court to remain in session at Birmingham at least 6 months in each calendar year was omitted as unnecessary and not in harmony with provisions respecting other districts.
The provisions for furnishing rooms and accommodations at Florence, Gadsden, Jasper and Opelika were omitted as obsolete upon advice of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available in each of these places.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2024—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–179, §1(1), substituted "five" for "seven" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 118–179, §1(2), substituted "Lauderdale, and Lawrence" for "and Lauderdale".
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 118–179, §1(3), struck out Lawrence and added Marshall to the counties comprising the Northeastern Division of the Northern District and struck out "and Decatur" after "Huntsville".
Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 118–179, §1(4), substituted "Cherokee, Clay, Cleburne, DeKalb, Etowah, Saint Clair," for "Clay, Cleburne,".
Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 118–179, §1(5), substituted "Fayette, Greene, Lamar, Marion, Pickens, Sumter, Tuscaloosa, Walker, and Winston" for "Greene, Pickens, Sumter, and Tuscaloosa".
Subsec. (a)(6). Pub. L. 118–179, §1(6), struck out par. (6) which read as follows: "The Middle Division comprises the counties of Cherokee, De Kalb, Etowah, Marshall, and Saint Clair.
"Court for the Middle Division shall be held at Gadsden."
Subsec. (a)(7). Pub. L. 118–179, §1(7), struck out par. (7) which read as follows: "The Jasper Division comprises the counties of Fayette, Lamar, Marion, Walker, and Winston.
"Court for the Jasper Division shall be held at Jasper."
1961—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 87–36 provided for holding court at Decatur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/81.