FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 44
Arbitration award and judgment
28 U.S.C. § 657
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter44 — ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 657 (Arbitration award and judgment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 657.
Text
(a)Filing and Effect of Arbitration Award.—An arbitration award made by an arbitrator under this chapter, along with proof of service of such award on the other party by the prevailing party or by the plaintiff, shall be filed promptly after the arbitration hearing is concluded with the clerk of the district court that referred the case to arbitration. Such award shall be entered as the judgment of the court after the time has expired for requesting a trial de novo. The judgment so entered shall be subject to the same provisions of law and shall have the same force and effect as a judgment of the court in a civil action, except that the judgment shall not be subject to review in any other court by appeal or otherwise.
(b)Sealing of Arbitration Award.—The district court shall provide, by
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
635 F.3d 401 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Marshall
610 F.2d 1128 (Third Circuit, 1979)
In the Matter of the Petition of Leslie Bacon for Writ of Habeas Corpus v. United States
449 F.2d 933 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
Wilson v. Commissioner
705 F.3d 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.
49 P.3d 803 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
United States v. Awadallah
202 F. Supp. 2d 55 (S.D. New York, 2002)
Housing Authority of Beaver County v. Alberts (In Re Alberts)
381 B.R. 171 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2008)
Empire Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Marshall
437 F. Supp. 873 (D. Montana, 1977)
In Re Inspection of Norfolk Dredging Company. Appeal of United States Secretary of Labor
783 F.2d 1526 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Donovan
540 F. Supp. 222 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)
Daniels v. Thomas & Betts Corp.
263 F.3d 66 (Third Circuit, 2001)
Kobell v. Reid Plastics, Inc.
136 F.R.D. 575 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1991)
In Re the Inspection of Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
548 F. Supp. 224 (N.D. Ohio, 1981)
Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Powhatan Energy Fund, LLC
286 F. Supp. 3d 751 (E.D. Virginia, 2017)
Environmental Industrial Services Corp. v. Souders
304 F. Supp. 2d 599 (D. Delaware, 2004)
Pebenito v. Werner Enterprises
217 F. Supp. 2d 350 (E.D. New York, 2002)
John D'IorIo Diane D'IorIo v. Majestic Lanes Inc., a New Jersey Corporation
370 F.3d 354 (Third Circuit, 2004)
Hamilton v. JC Penney Co Inc
127 F. App'x 47 (Third Circuit, 2005)
Dupree v. Ultramar Diamond
(Fifth Circuit, 2003)
D'Iorio v. Majestic Lanes Inc
(Third Circuit, 2004)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IX, §901(a), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4662; amended Pub. L. 105–315, §9, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2997.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Evidence, referred to in subsec. (c)(3)(A), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
1998—Pub. L. 105–315 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to arbitration award and judgment for provisions relating to compensation of arbitrators.
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Evidence, referred to in subsec. (c)(3)(A), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
1998—Pub. L. 105–315 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to arbitration award and judgment for provisions relating to compensation of arbitrators.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/657.