FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 33
Positions in excepted service
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
All positions in the Federal Bureau of Investigation are excepted from the competitive service, and the incumbents of such positions occupy positions in the excepted service.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 536 (Positions in excepted service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Charles E. Egger v. Harlan C. Phillips
710 F.2d 292 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Margaret A. Padula v. William Webster, Director, F.B.I
822 F.2d 97 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Joseph Feit v. John Ward and Eugene Grapa
886 F.2d 848 (Seventh Circuit, 1989)
Shirey v. Devine
670 F.2d 1188 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Thomas Henry Carter v. United States of America
407 F.2d 1238 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Donald R. Ashton, Jr. v. Benjamin R. Civiletti, Attorney General of the United States of America, Department of Justice
613 F.2d 923 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Louis S. Bullard, Special Agent, Fbi, Cross-Appellant v. William H. Webster, Cross-Appellees
623 F.2d 1042 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Lawrence Moon v. Larry Phillips
854 F.2d 147 (Seventh Circuit, 1988)
Thomas E. Egan v. Department of the Navy
802 F.2d 1563 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Painter v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
537 F. Supp. 232 (N.D. Georgia, 1982)
BGHA, LLC v. City of Universal City
340 F.3d 295 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Byron Bedell v. United States
669 F. App'x 620 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Roberts v. United States Department of Justice
366 F. Supp. 2d 13 (District of Columbia, 2005)
Kizas v. Webster
492 F. Supp. 1135 (District of Columbia, 1980)
David M. Wehner v. Edward H. Levi, Attorney General
562 F.2d 1276 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
Mack v. United States
653 F. Supp. 70 (S.D. New York, 1986)
James Joseph Painter v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
694 F.2d 255 (Federal Circuit, 1982)
MacK v. US, FBI
653 F. Supp. 70 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Thelma F. Mead v. Merit Systems Protection Board
687 F.2d 285 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
King v. United States
130 Fed. Cl. 476 (Federal Claims, 2017)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §4(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 617.)
Editorial Notes
The section is revised and restated to eliminate ambiguity and give true effect to the prohibition against the use of appropriations to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The language used to define the excepted status of the positions, officers, and employees is based on revised sections 2102 and 2103 of title 5, United States Code.
The provisions of this section were made permanent by the Act of July 28, 1950, 64 Stat. 380. Identical provisions appearing in former section 300d of title 5 are derived from the Department of Justice Appropriation Act, 1965, and earlier appropriation Acts for the Department of Justice running back to 1942, which Acts are identified in a note under former section 300d of title 5, U.S.C. 1964 ed.
The provisions of this section were made permanent by the Act of July 28, 1950, 64 Stat. 380. Identical provisions appearing in former section 300d of title 5 are derived from the Department of Justice Appropriation Act, 1965, and earlier appropriation Acts for the Department of Justice running back to 1942, which Acts are identified in a note under former section 300d of title 5, U.S.C. 1964 ed.