FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 23
Automated case information
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure·Ch. 23 — CIVIL JUSTICE EXPENSE AND DELAY REDUCTION PLANS
(a)The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall ensure that each United States district court has the automated capability readily to retrieve information about the status of each case in such court.
(b)(1) In carrying out subsection (a), the Director shall prescribe—
(A)the information to be recorded in district court automated systems; and
(B)standards for uniform categorization or characterization of judicial actions for the purpose of recording information on judicial actions in the district court automated systems.
(2)The uniform standards prescribed under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection shall include a definition of what constitutes a dismissal of a case and standards for measuring the period for which a motion has been pending.
(c)Each United
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 481 (Automated case information) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas Doyle v. William Brock, Secretary, Department of Labor
821 F.2d 778 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Wirtz v. Local Union No. 1622, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners
285 F. Supp. 455 (N.D. California, 1968)
Irving Falk, Evalene Falk, Morris Milstein and Ada Milstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
332 F.2d 922 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
Solis v. Local 234, Transport Workers Union
855 F. Supp. 2d 329 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. JOHNSON
(D. Maine, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title I, §103(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5095.)