FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 11

Trials at ports other than New York

28 U.S.C. § 256
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter11 — COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 256 (Trials at ports other than New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 256.

Text

(a)The chief judge may designate any judge or judges of the court to proceed, together with necessary assistants, to any port or to any place within the jurisdiction of the United States to preside at a trial or hearing at the port or place.
(b)Upon application of a party or upon his own initiative, and upon a showing that the interests of economy, efficiency, and justice will be served, the chief judge may issue an order authorizing a judge of the court to preside in an evidentiary hearing in a foreign country whose laws do not prohibit such a hearing: Provided, however, That an interlocutory appeal may be taken from such an order pursuant to the provisions of section 1292(d)(1) of this title, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may, in its discretion, conside

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re United States
877 F.2d 1568 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
22 case citations
Michelin Tire Corp. v. United States
469 F. Supp. 270 (U.S. Customs Court, 1979)
13 case citations
United States v. Mizrahie
606 F. Supp. 703 (Court of International Trade, 1985)
5 case citations
Shannon Luminous Material Co. v. United States
69 Cust. Ct. 317 (U.S. Customs Court, 1972)
4 case citations
United States v. Universal Fruits & Vegetables Corp.
387 F. Supp. 2d 1251 (Court of International Trade, 2005)
2 case citations
United States v. Daewoo International (America) Corp.
13 Ct. Int'l Trade 331 (Court of International Trade, 1989)
1 case citations
Simod America Corp. v. United States
10 Ct. Int'l Trade 466 (Court of International Trade, 1986)
1 case citations
Zoltek Corp. v. United States
13 Ct. Int'l Trade 1098 (Court of International Trade, 1989)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 91–271, title I, §109, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 277; amended Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §107, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 28.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1982—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "section 1292(d)(1) of this title, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may, in its discretion, consider the appeal" for "section 1541(b) of this title, subject to the discretion of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals as set forth in that section".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

Effective Date
Pub. L. 91–271, title I, §122, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 281, provided that:
"(a) This title [see Short Title of 1970 Amendment note set out under section 1 of this title] shall become effective on October 1, 1970, and shall thereafter apply to all actions and proceedings in the Customs Court and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals except those involving merchandise entered before the effective date for which trial has commenced by such effective date.
"(b) An appeal for reappraisement timely filed with the Bureau of Customs before the effective date, but as to which trial has not commenced by such date, shall be deemed to have had a summons timely and properly filed under this title. When the judgment or order of the United States Customs Court has become final in this appeal, the papers shall be returned to the appropriate customs officer to decide any remaining matters relating to the entry in accordance with section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended [section 1500 of Title 19, Customs Duties]. A protest or summons filed after final decision on an appeal for reappraisement shall not include issues which were raised or could have been raised on the appeal for reappraisement.
"(c) A protest timely filed with the Bureau of Customs before the effective date of enactment of this Act [June 2, 1970], which is disallowed before that date, and as to which trial has not commenced by such date, shall be deemed to have had a summons timely and properly filed under this title.
"(d) All other provisions of this Act [see Short Title notes set out under section 1 of this title and section 1500 of Title 19] shall apply to appeals and disallowed protests deemed to have had summonses timely and properly filed under this section."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/256.