FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 154
Scope of Federal review; district court adjudications
28 U.S.C. § 2264
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter154 — SPECIAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEDURES IN CAPITAL CASES
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2264 (Scope of Federal review; district court adjudications) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2264.
Text
(a)Whenever a State prisoner under capital sentence files a petition for habeas corpus relief to which this chapter applies, the district court shall only consider a claim or claims that have been raised and decided on the merits in the State courts, unless the failure to raise the claim properly is—
(1)the result of State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States;
(2)the result of the Supreme Court's recognition of a new Federal right that is made retroactively applicable; or
(3)based on a factual predicate that could not have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence in time to present the claim for State or Federal post-conviction review.
(b)Following review subject to subsections (a), (d), and (e) of section 2254, the court shall rule on the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brecht v. Abrahamson
507 U.S. 619 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Lindh v. Murphy
521 U.S. 320 (Supreme Court, 1997)
Duncan v. Walker
533 U.S. 167 (Supreme Court, 2001)
Withrow v. Williams
507 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden
96 F.3d 856 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, Superintendent
114 F.3d 1484 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Harvey Lee Green, Jr. v. James B. French, Warden, Central Prison
143 F.3d 865 (Fourth Circuit, 1998)
Kelley v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
377 F.3d 1317 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Skaggs v. Parker
235 F.3d 261 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
Charles Edward Hunter v. United States of America, Henry C. Bailey v. John E. Nagle, Warden, Jeff Sessions, Attorney General for the State of Alabama
101 F.3d 1565 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
Richard Cooey v. Ralph Coyle, Warden
289 F.3d 882 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
Anderson v. Collins
18 F.3d 1208 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
Pedro L. Gochicoa v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
118 F.3d 440 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Romano v. Gibson
278 F.3d 1145 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)
Paul Browning v. Renee Baker
875 F.3d 444 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Larry Hudson v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
601 F.2d 785 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
Heath Allen Wilkins v. Michael Bowersox
145 F.3d 1006 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Jerome Henderson, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Terry L. Collins, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
262 F.3d 615 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)
Michael Maurino v. Richard Johnson, Warden
210 F.3d 638 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
James Moore v. Arthur Tate, Jr., Superintendent
882 F.2d 1107 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, §107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section applicable to cases pending on or after Apr. 24, 1996, see section 107(c) of Pub. L. 104–132, set out as a note under section 2261 of this title.
Effective Date
Section applicable to cases pending on or after Apr. 24, 1996, see section 107(c) of Pub. L. 104–132, set out as a note under section 2261 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2264.