FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 153
Notice
28 U.S.C. § 2252
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter153 — HABEAS CORPUS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2252 (Notice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2252.
Text
Prior to the hearing of a habeas corpus proceeding in behalf of a person in custody of State officers or by virtue of State laws notice shall be served on the attorney general or other appropriate officer of such State as the justice or judge at the time of issuing the writ shall direct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Brian Edward Ratigan
351 F.3d 957 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Miller
67 M.J. 385 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2009)
United States v. Robert Ellison
113 F.3d 77 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
Farmer v. McBride
177 F. App'x 327 (Fourth Circuit, 2006)
Donald F. Baker v. Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas, Etc., Danny E. Hill, 47th District Attorney
743 F.2d 236 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Vaughn Mitchell v. Duncan MacLaren
933 F.3d 526 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)
Lavallee v. Coplan
239 F. Supp. 2d 140 (D. New Hampshire, 2003)
Thornton v. Sabol
620 F. Supp. 2d 203 (D. Massachusetts, 2009)
Ziglar v. United States
201 F. Supp. 3d 1315 (M.D. Alabama, 2016)
United States ex rel. Senk v. Russell
274 F. Supp. 783 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1967)
Opinion No.
(Texas Attorney General Reports, 1986)
Coles v. Attorney General, State Of Ohio
(S.D. Ohio, 2019)
Landrón-Class v. United States
86 F. Supp. 3d 64 (D. Puerto Rico, 2015)
Dial v. Byers
(W.D. Arkansas, 2024)
Wayne Coombs v. David DiGuglielmo
581 F. App'x 129 (Third Circuit, 2014)
Krasniqi v. United States
(S.D. New York, 2022)
United States v. Stephen Puza, III
594 F. App'x 100 (Third Circuit, 2015)
Wallace v. Addison
602 F. App'x 458 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
Jordan v. Hale
2023 IL App (5th) 210218-U (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2023)
Davis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
(M.D. Alabama, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 967.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §462 (R.S. §762).
Section 462 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was limited to alien prisoners described in section 453 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The revised section extends to all cases of all prisoners under State custody or authority, leaving it to the justice or judge to prescribe the notice to State officers, to specify the officer served, and to satisfy himself that such notice has been given.
Provision for making due proof of such service was omitted as unnecessary. The sheriff's or marshal's return is sufficient.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §462 (R.S. §762).
Section 462 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was limited to alien prisoners described in section 453 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The revised section extends to all cases of all prisoners under State custody or authority, leaving it to the justice or judge to prescribe the notice to State officers, to specify the officer served, and to satisfy himself that such notice has been given.
Provision for making due proof of such service was omitted as unnecessary. The sheriff's or marshal's return is sufficient.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2252.