FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 151
Further relief
28 U.S.C. § 2202
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter151 — DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 2202 (Further relief) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 2202.
Text
Further necessary or proper relief based on a declaratory judgment or decree may be granted, after reasonable notice and hearing, against any adverse party whose rights have been determined by such judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
366 F.3d 1253 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Security Mutual Casualty Company v. Century Casualty Company
621 F.2d 1062 (Tenth Circuit, 1980)
Nos. 97-5735, 97-5736
177 F.3d 210 (Third Circuit, 1999)
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. Wilson
124 F.3d 1050 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Schell v. OXY USA Inc.
814 F.3d 1107 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Paul T. Cito v. Bridgewater Township Police Department
892 F.2d 23 (Third Circuit, 1990)
Inland Empire Public Lands Council v. United States Forest Service
88 F.3d 754 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Arrow Lakes Dairy, Inc. v. Gill
200 F. Supp. 729 (D. Connecticut, 1961)
Kinsella v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 7
402 F. Supp. 1155 (W.D. New York, 1975)
Crosby v. Selective Service System, Local Board No. 3
315 F. Supp. 228 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)
Moore v. Shapiro
293 F. Supp. 411 (N.D. Illinois, 1968)
LB Steel, LLC v. Walsh Construction Co. (In re LB Steel, LLC)
572 B.R. 690 (N.D. Illinois, 2017)
ASARCO, LLC v. Montana Resources, Inc.
514 B.R. 168 (S.D. Texas, 2013)
Randell v. Newark Housing Authority
266 F. Supp. 171 (D. New Jersey, 1967)
United Teacher Associates Insurance v. Union Labor Life Insurance
414 F.3d 558 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Johnston
146 F. Supp. 5 (D. Kansas, 1956)
Small v. Hudson
322 F. Supp. 519 (M.D. Florida, 1970)
Danner v. Louiseville Gas & Electric Co.
66 F.R.D. 51 (W.D. Kentucky, 1974)
Tillman v. Dade County School Board
327 F. Supp. 927 (S.D. Florida, 1971)
Smith v. Lehman
533 F. Supp. 1015 (E.D. New York, 1982)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 964.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §400 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §274d, as added June 14, 1934, ch. 512, 48 Stat. 955; Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 829, §405, 49 Stat. 1027).
This section is based on the second paragraph of section 400 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section are incorporated in section 2201 of this title.
Provision in said section 400 that the court shall require adverse parties whose rights are adjudicated to show cause why further relief should not be granted forthwith, were omitted as unnecessary and covered by the revised section.
Provisions relating to submission of interrogatories to a jury were omitted as covered by rule 49 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
Chapter catchline was changed by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1978—Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §250(b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2672, directed the addition of item 2256 "Habeas corpus from bankruptcy courts", which amendment did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.
1966—Pub. L. 89–711, §3, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1106, substituted "Federal courts" for "State Courts" in item 2254.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §400 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §274d, as added June 14, 1934, ch. 512, 48 Stat. 955; Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 829, §405, 49 Stat. 1027).
This section is based on the second paragraph of section 400 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section are incorporated in section 2201 of this title.
Provision in said section 400 that the court shall require adverse parties whose rights are adjudicated to show cause why further relief should not be granted forthwith, were omitted as unnecessary and covered by the revised section.
Provisions relating to submission of interrogatories to a jury were omitted as covered by rule 49 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
Chapter catchline was changed by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1978—Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §250(b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2672, directed the addition of item 2256 "Habeas corpus from bankruptcy courts", which amendment did not become effective pursuant to section 402(b) of Pub. L. 95–598, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.
1966—Pub. L. 89–711, §3, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1106, substituted "Federal courts" for "State Courts" in item 2254.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 2202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/2202.