FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 123

Patent infringement action; disclaimer not filed

28 U.S.C. § 1928

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1928 (Patent infringement action; disclaimer not filed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1928.

Text

Whenever a judgment is rendered for the plaintiff in any patent infringement action involving a part of a patent and it appears that the patentee, in his specifications, claimed to be, but was not, the original and first inventor or discoverer of any material or substantial part of the thing patented, no costs shall be included in such judgment, unless the proper disclaimer has been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office prior to the commencement of the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marx v. General Revenue Corp.
133 S. Ct. 1166 (Supreme Court, 2013)
674 case citations
Securacomm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom Inc.
224 F.3d 273 (Third Circuit, 2000)
338 case citations
McDonald v. McCarthy
966 F.2d 112 (Third Circuit, 1992)
23 case citations
O'Connell v. DeMartino (In Re DeMartino)
448 B.R. 122 (E.D. New York, 2011)
16 case citations
In Re Liang-Houh Shieh
738 A.2d 814 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)
13 case citations
Bishman Manufacturing Co. And George T. Hemmeter v. Stewart-Warner Corporation
380 F.2d 336 (Seventh Circuit, 1967)
11 case citations
Lamoureux v. Genesis Pharmacy Services Inc.
226 F.R.D. 154 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
10 case citations
Sterling Varnish Company v. Louis Allis Company
149 F. Supp. 826 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1957)
5 case citations
MPT, Inc. v. Marathon Labels, Inc.
505 F. Supp. 2d 401 (N.D. Ohio, 2007)
3 case citations
Orlando Garcia v. Gateway Hotel L.P.
82 F.4th 750 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
2 case citations
Billings v. Cape Cod Child Development Program, Inc.
270 F. Supp. 2d 175 (D. Massachusetts, 2003)
2 case citations
Chen v. WMK 89th Street LLC
(S.D. New York, 2019)
Obrien v. FCA US LLC
(N.D. California, 2019)
Bresgal v. Brock
637 F. Supp. 278 (D. Oregon, 1985)
Berryman v. Epp
884 F. Supp. 242 (E.D. Michigan, 1995)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(b)(17)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–585.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §821 (R.S. §973).
Word "action" was substituted for "any suit at law or in equity" to conform with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "or decree" were omitted after "judgment," because a judgment under Rule 54(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by definition includes a decree.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1999—Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "United States Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1928.