FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 123

Docket fees and costs of briefs

28 U.S.C. § 1923

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1923 (Docket fees and costs of briefs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1923.

Text

(a)Attorney's and proctor's docket fees in courts of the United States may be taxed as costs as follows: $20 on trial or final hearing (including a default judgment whether entered by the court or by the clerk) in civil, criminal, or admiralty cases, except that in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction where the libellant recovers less than $50 the proctor's docket fee shall be $10; $20 in admiralty appeals involving not over $1,000; $50 in admiralty appeals involving not over $5,000; $100 in admiralty appeals involving more than $5,000; $5 on discontinuance of a civil action; $5 on motion for judgment and other proceedings on recognizances; $2.50 for each deposition admitted in evidence.
(b)The docket fees of United States attorneys and United States trustees shall be paid to the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
421 U.S. 240 (Supreme Court, 1975)
4,558 case citations
Hutto v. Finney
437 U.S. 678 (Supreme Court, 1979)
2,240 case citations
Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.
386 U.S. 714 (Supreme Court, 1967)
766 case citations
Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
272 F. Supp. 332 (S.D. Indiana, 1967)
67 case citations
John P. McNamara v. J. C. Moody, Etc.
606 F.2d 621 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
59 case citations
Panola Land Buying Ass'n v. Clark
844 F.2d 1506 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
57 case citations
Gumbhir v. Kansas State Board of Pharmacy
646 P.2d 1078 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1982)
55 case citations
HTS, Inc. v. Boley
954 F. Supp. 2d 927 (D. Arizona, 2013)
50 case citations
Russo v. New York
672 F.2d 1014 (Second Circuit, 1982)
37 case citations
Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh
395 F. Supp. 1275 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1975)
31 case citations
Marks v. Calendine
80 F.R.D. 24 (N.D. West Virginia, 1978)
26 case citations
Hines v. City of Albany
862 F.3d 215 (Second Circuit, 2017)
24 case citations
Edwin A. Walker v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
443 F.2d 33 (Seventh Circuit, 1971)
24 case citations
Stacy v. Williams
50 F.R.D. 52 (N.D. Mississippi, 1970)
22 case citations
Balance Point Divorce Funding, LLC v. Scrantom
305 F.R.D. 67 (S.D. New York, 2015)
17 case citations
Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons
419 F.2d 372 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
13 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 956; June 18, 1954, ch. 304, 68 Stat. 253; Pub. L. 95–598, title II, §245, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2671.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§571, 572, and 578 (R.S. §§823, 824; May 28, 1896, ch. 252, §§6, 24, 29 Stat. 179, 186; Feb. 26, 1919, ch. 49, §1, 40 Stat. 1182; July 19, 1919, ch. 24, §1, 41 Stat. 209; Feb. 11, 1921, ch. 46, 41 Stat. 1099; June 6, 1930, ch. 409, 46 Stat. 522; Aug. 3, 1935, ch. 431, §1, 49 Stat. 513).
Section consolidates sections 571, 572, and 578 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
The phrase "$20 on trial or final hearing in civil, criminal, or admiralty cases" was substituted for the following provisions of section 572 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., "On trial before a jury, in civil or criminal causes or before referees, or on a final hearing in equity or admiralty, a docket fee of $20", and the limitation of $10 in "cases at law when judgment is rendered without a jury" was omitted. This simplified restatement provides for a single docket fee in each case which reaches final hearing or trial. Since the docket fee is arbitrary, any limitation or distinction between law cases tried with or without a jury is unrealistic.
Word "solicitor" was omitted as obsolete and inapplicable in civil, criminal, or admiralty practice.
Words "motion for judgment" were substituted for "scire facias" to conform to Rules 2 and 81 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Codification
Pub. L. 95–598, title IV, §408(c), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2687, as amended by Pub. L. 98–166, title II, §200, Nov. 28, 1983, 97 Stat. 1081; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §323, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 358; Pub. L. 99–429, Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 985; Pub. L. 99–500, §101(b) [title II, §200], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–39, 1783–45, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(b) [title II, §200], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–39, 3341–45; Pub. L. 99–554, title III, §307(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3125, which provided for the deletion of any references to United States Trustees in this title at a prospective date, was repealed by Pub. L. 99–554, title III, §307(b), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3125.

Amendments
1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–598 inserted "and United States trustees" after "United States attorneys".
1954—Subsec. (a). Act June 18, 1954, inserted in first item "including a default judgment whether entered by the court or by the clerk" after "final hearing".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–598 effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 402(c) of Pub. L. 95–598, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1923.