FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 121
Challenging compliance with selection procedures
28 U.S.C. § 1867
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter121 — JURIES; TRIAL BY JURY
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1867 (Challenging compliance with selection procedures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1867.
Text
(a)In criminal cases, before the voir dire examination begins, or within seven days after the defendant discovered or could have discovered, by the exercise of diligence, the grounds therefor, whichever is earlier, the defendant may move to dismiss the indictment or stay the proceedings against him on the ground of substantial failure to comply with the provisions of this title in selecting the grand or petit jury.
(b)In criminal cases, before the voir dire examination begins, or within seven days after the Attorney General of the United States discovered or could have discovered, by the exercise of diligence, the grounds therefor, whichever is earlier, the Attorney General may move to dismiss the indictment or stay the proceedings on the ground of substantial failure to comply with the
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Benjamin Craig Long v. Bando Manufacturing of America, Inc.
201 F.3d 754 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Winter
663 F.2d 1120 (First Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Webster
639 F.2d 174 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
State v. LaMere
2000 MT 45 (Montana Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Noah
475 F.2d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Erickson
75 F.3d 470 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Government of Virgin Islands v. Navarro
513 F.2d 11 (Third Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Schneider
111 F.3d 197 (First Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Geelan
509 F.2d 737 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Ramirez
884 F.2d 1524 (First Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Long
88 F.R.D. 701 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
United States v. Wheeler
79 F. App'x 656 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Farr v. US West, Inc.
58 F.3d 1361 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Ronald Greenland v. United States
661 F. App'x 210 (Third Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Douglas
837 F. Supp. 817 (N.D. Texas, 1993)
United States v. Ricky Carter
149 F.3d 1191 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Tillman
80 F. App'x 520 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Nix
264 F. Supp. 3d 429 (W.D. New York, 2017)
United States v. Jose Montelongo
582 F. App'x 404 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 953; Pub. L. 85–259, Sept. 2, 1957, 71 Stat. 583; Pub. L. 90–274, §101, Mar. 27, 1968, 82 Stat. 59.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §416 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §279, 36 Stat. 1165; Jan. 31, 1929, ch. 126, 45 Stat. 1145).
Provisions for service by a disinterested person when marshal or his deputy is disqualified is incorporated in section 1868 of this title.
Provision for payment and reimbursement of postage and registry fee were omitted as covered by section 560 of this title.
Word "summons" was substituted for "writ of venire facias" in harmony with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which abolished unnecessary forms. See Rule 81(b) thereof, and Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Provision of section 416 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., that the receipt of the person so addressed by registered mail should be regarded as personal service, was omitted. Such omission is consistent with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure providing that service by mail is complete upon mailing.
Provision for attachment to the return of the addressee's receipt for the summons, was inserted to cover its disposition.
Provision that no mileage shall be allowed for service by mail was omitted as unnecessary.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1968—Pub. L. 90–274 substituted provisions by which a defendant may assert noncompliance with the selection procedures of the jury for provisions covering the issuance of summonses for jurors and service thereof upon jurors.
1957—Pub. L. 85–259 inserted "or certified" in second and third sentences.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–274 effective 270 days after Mar. 27, 1968, except as to cases in which an indictment has been returned or a petit jury empaneled prior to such effective date, see section 104 of Pub. L. 90–274, set out as a note under section 1861 of this title.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §416 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §279, 36 Stat. 1165; Jan. 31, 1929, ch. 126, 45 Stat. 1145).
Provisions for service by a disinterested person when marshal or his deputy is disqualified is incorporated in section 1868 of this title.
Provision for payment and reimbursement of postage and registry fee were omitted as covered by section 560 of this title.
Word "summons" was substituted for "writ of venire facias" in harmony with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which abolished unnecessary forms. See Rule 81(b) thereof, and Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Provision of section 416 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., that the receipt of the person so addressed by registered mail should be regarded as personal service, was omitted. Such omission is consistent with Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure providing that service by mail is complete upon mailing.
Provision for attachment to the return of the addressee's receipt for the summons, was inserted to cover its disposition.
Provision that no mileage shall be allowed for service by mail was omitted as unnecessary.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1968—Pub. L. 90–274 substituted provisions by which a defendant may assert noncompliance with the selection procedures of the jury for provisions covering the issuance of summonses for jurors and service thereof upon jurors.
1957—Pub. L. 85–259 inserted "or certified" in second and third sentences.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–274 effective 270 days after Mar. 27, 1968, except as to cases in which an indictment has been returned or a petit jury empaneled prior to such effective date, see section 104 of Pub. L. 90–274, set out as a note under section 1861 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1867.