FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 121
Qualifications for jury service
28 U.S.C. § 1865
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter121 — JURIES; TRIAL BY JURY
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1865 (Qualifications for jury service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1865.
Text
(a)The chief judge of the district court, or such other district court judge as the plan may provide, on his initiative or upon recommendation of the clerk or jury commission, or the clerk under supervision of the court if the court's jury selection plan so authorizes, shall determine solely on the basis of information provided on the juror qualification form and other competent evidence whether a person is unqualified for, or exempt, or to be excused from jury service. The clerk shall enter such determination in the space provided on the juror qualification form and in any alphabetical list of names drawn from the master jury wheel. If a person did not appear in response to a summons, such fact shall be noted on said list.
(b)In making such determination the chief judge of the district
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hernandez v. New York
500 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1991)
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood
464 U.S. 548 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Baldwin v. New York
399 U.S. 66 (Supreme Court, 1970)
United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. Shuck
349 F.2d 720 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Rollen Jackson v. State of Alabama State Tenure
405 F.3d 1276 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Irving B. Kahn and Teleprompter Corporation
472 F.2d 272 (Second Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Paul Guzman
468 F.2d 1245 (Second Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Richard Frederick Ross
468 F.2d 1213 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Gonzalez-Soberal
109 F.3d 64 (First Circuit, 1997)
Harriet Dow, Administratrix of the Estate of Paul Dow, Deceased v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation
224 F.2d 414 (Third Circuit, 1955)
United States v. Patrick Carl Gast
457 F.2d 141 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
Roy Justin v. Louis Jacobs
449 F.2d 1017 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Cohen
275 F. Supp. 724 (D. Maryland, 1967)
United States v. Oscar Pequeno De Leon
462 F.2d 170 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Pellegrini
441 F. Supp. 1367 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
United States v. Erwin
723 F. Supp. 1285 (C.D. Illinois, 1989)
Frederick J. Chase v. United States
468 F.2d 141 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Frank Anthony Ware
473 F.2d 530 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
Billy Walker v. United States
800 F.3d 720 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Jose Colon
64 F.4th 589 (Fourth Circuit, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 952; Pub. L. 90–274, §101, Mar. 27, 1968, 82 Stat. 58; Pub. L. 92–269, §1, Apr. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 117; Pub. L. 95–572, §3(a), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2453; Pub. L. 100–702, title VIII, §803(b), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4658; Pub. L. 106–518, title III, §305, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2418.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§181, 413 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§100, 277, 36 Stat. 1121, 1164).
Section consolidates a part of section 181 with section 413 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of said section 181 are incorporated in section 115 of this title.
Word "jurors" was changed to "grand and petit jurors" upon authority of Agnew v. United States, 1897, 17 S.Ct. 235, 165 U.S. 36, 41 L.Ed. 624, construing such term to include both types of jurors.
The last sentence of subsection (a) was added to conform with existing practice in many districts. Subsection (b) extends to all districts a provision of section 181 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which was designed for the convenience of the districts in Ohio and permitted jurors drawn for service at Cleveland, Toledo, and Columbus to serve at Youngstown, Lima, and Steubenville, respectively.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–518, §305(1), inserted "or the clerk under supervision of the court if the court's jury selection plan so authorizes," after "jury commission,".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–518, §305(2), inserted "or the clerk if the court's jury selection plan so provides," after "may provide," in introductory provisions.
1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–702 substituted "in any alphabetical" for "the alphabetical".
1978—Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 95–572 struck out "by pardon or amnesty" after "civil rights have not been restored".
1972—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 92–269 substituted "eighteen years old" for "twenty-one years old".
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–274 substituted provisions for the excusing of persons from jury service by the chief judge of the district court or by other district court judge for provisions requiring the selection of jurors so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial and so as to minimize the expense and burden of jury service.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–274 substituted provisions setting out the conditions of ineligibility for jury service for provisions authorizing the service of jurors in a place within the district other than the place for which the jurors were summoned.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–572 applicable with respect to any grand or petit juror summoned for service or actually serving on or after Nov. 2, 1978, see section 7(a) of Pub. L. 95–572, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1363 of this title.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–274 effective 270 days after Mar. 27, 1968, except as to cases in which an indictment has been returned or a petit jury empaneled prior to such effective date, see section 104 of Pub. L. 90–274, set out as a note under section 1861 of this title.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§181, 413 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§100, 277, 36 Stat. 1121, 1164).
Section consolidates a part of section 181 with section 413 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of said section 181 are incorporated in section 115 of this title.
Word "jurors" was changed to "grand and petit jurors" upon authority of Agnew v. United States, 1897, 17 S.Ct. 235, 165 U.S. 36, 41 L.Ed. 624, construing such term to include both types of jurors.
The last sentence of subsection (a) was added to conform with existing practice in many districts. Subsection (b) extends to all districts a provision of section 181 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which was designed for the convenience of the districts in Ohio and permitted jurors drawn for service at Cleveland, Toledo, and Columbus to serve at Youngstown, Lima, and Steubenville, respectively.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–518, §305(1), inserted "or the clerk under supervision of the court if the court's jury selection plan so authorizes," after "jury commission,".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–518, §305(2), inserted "or the clerk if the court's jury selection plan so provides," after "may provide," in introductory provisions.
1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–702 substituted "in any alphabetical" for "the alphabetical".
1978—Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 95–572 struck out "by pardon or amnesty" after "civil rights have not been restored".
1972—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 92–269 substituted "eighteen years old" for "twenty-one years old".
1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–274 substituted provisions for the excusing of persons from jury service by the chief judge of the district court or by other district court judge for provisions requiring the selection of jurors so as to be most favorable to an impartial trial and so as to minimize the expense and burden of jury service.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–274 substituted provisions setting out the conditions of ineligibility for jury service for provisions authorizing the service of jurors in a place within the district other than the place for which the jurors were summoned.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–572 applicable with respect to any grand or petit juror summoned for service or actually serving on or after Nov. 2, 1978, see section 7(a) of Pub. L. 95–572, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1363 of this title.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–274 effective 270 days after Mar. 27, 1968, except as to cases in which an indictment has been returned or a petit jury empaneled prior to such effective date, see section 104 of Pub. L. 90–274, set out as a note under section 1861 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1865.