FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 117
Contempt
28 U.S.C. § 1784
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter117 — EVIDENCE; DEPOSITIONS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1784 (Contempt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1784.
Text
(a)The court of the United States which has issued a subpoena served in a foreign country may order the person who has failed to appear or who has failed to produce a document or other thing as directed therein to show cause before it at a designated time why he should not be punished for contempt.
(b)The court, in the order to show cause, may direct that any of the person's property within the United States be levied upon or seized, in the manner provided by law or court rules governing levy or seizure under execution, and held to satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against him pursuant to subsection (d) of this section if adequate security, in such amount as the court may direct in the order, be given for any damage that he might suffer should he not be found in contempt. Securit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General Sessions
417 F.2d 728 (D.C. Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Roland E. Thompson
319 F.2d 665 (Second Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Bennett
12 M.J. 463 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1982)
United States v. Meyer Lansky
496 F.2d 1063 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
People v. Watson
213 Cal. App. 3d 446 (California Court of Appeal, 1989)
State v. Aaron
745 P.2d 1316 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1987)
In re the Issuance of a Subpoena Upon Thompson
213 F. Supp. 372 (S.D. New York, 1963)
United States v. Victor Danenza
528 F.2d 390 (Second Circuit, 1975)
Walther-Meade v. Leidos, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2023)
Hastings v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 949; Pub. L. 88–619, §11, Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 998.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§714, 715, 716, 717, and 718 (July 3, 1926, ch. 762, §§4–8, 44 Stat. 836).
Sections 714–718 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were consolidated, since all relate to contempt by a witness served personally in a foreign country.
The last sentence omits specific reference to section 118 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., now incorporated in section 1655 of this title, which provides for the method of opening judgments rendered on publication of process. (See also Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.)
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1964—Pub. L. 88–619 amended section generally, and among other changes, authorized the court to order a person to show cause for failing to produce a document or other thing in subsec. (a), provided that a copy of the order to show cause shall be served in accordance with section 1783(b) of this title, and struck out provisions requiring the marshal making levy or seizure to forward to any United States consul in the country where the witness may be, a copy of the order and a request for its personal service, and to cause publication of the order in the district where the issuing court sits, in subsec. (c), and struck out provisions in subsec. (d) permitting any judgment rendered upon service by publication only to be opened for answer within one year.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§714, 715, 716, 717, and 718 (July 3, 1926, ch. 762, §§4–8, 44 Stat. 836).
Sections 714–718 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were consolidated, since all relate to contempt by a witness served personally in a foreign country.
The last sentence omits specific reference to section 118 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., now incorporated in section 1655 of this title, which provides for the method of opening judgments rendered on publication of process. (See also Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.)
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1964—Pub. L. 88–619 amended section generally, and among other changes, authorized the court to order a person to show cause for failing to produce a document or other thing in subsec. (a), provided that a copy of the order to show cause shall be served in accordance with section 1783(b) of this title, and struck out provisions requiring the marshal making levy or seizure to forward to any United States consul in the country where the witness may be, a copy of the order and a request for its personal service, and to cause publication of the order in the district where the issuing court sits, in subsec. (c), and struck out provisions in subsec. (d) permitting any judgment rendered upon service by publication only to be opened for answer within one year.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1784.