FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 7

Official duty station; residence

28 U.S.C. § 175
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter7 — UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 175 (Official duty station; residence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 175.

Text

(a)The official duty station of each judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims is the District of Columbia.
(b)After appointment and while in active service, each judge shall reside within fifty miles of the District of Columbia.
(c)Retired judges of the Court of Federal Claims are not subject to restrictions as to residence. The place where a retired judge maintains the actual abode in which such judge customarily lives shall be deemed to be the judge's official duty station for the purposes of section 456 of this title.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.
389 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1967)
87 case citations
Roofing Wholesale Co., Inc. v. Palmer
502 P.2d 1327 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1972)
28 case citations
United States v. Petroff-Tachomakoff
5 C.M.A. 824 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)
17 case citations
Melton v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp. (In Re Melton)
187 B.R. 98 (W.D. New York, 1995)
9 case citations
Hardy v. Ross (In re Hardy)
589 B.R. 217 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
5 case citations
Datronics Engineers, Inc. v. United States
210 Ct. Cl. 665 (Court of Claims, 1976)
4 case citations
In Re: Latricia L. Hardy
(District of Columbia, 2018)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 89–425, §2, May 11, 1966, 80 Stat. 140; amended Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §105(a), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 27; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516; Pub. L. 106–518, title III, §307, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2419.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
A prior section 175, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 898, required three judges of the Court of Claims to constitute a quorum and the concurrence of three judges for any decision, prior to repeal by section 2 of Pub. L. 89–425.

Amendments
2000—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–518 added subsec. (c).
1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".
1982—Pub. L. 97–164 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to the official duty station and residence of Claims Court judges for provisions relating to assignment of judges, divisions, hearings, quorums and decisions. See section 174 of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/175.