FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 113
Patent infringement action
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
In a patent infringement action commenced in a district where the defendant is not a resident but has a regular and established place of business, service of process, summons or subpoena upon such defendant may be made upon his agent or agents conducting such business.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 1694 (Patent infringement action) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Japan Gas Lighter Association v. Ronson Corp.
257 F. Supp. 219 (D. New Jersey, 1966)
In Re GOOGLE LLC
949 F.3d 1338 (Federal Circuit, 2020)
Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products Company
328 F.2d 949 (Seventh Circuit, 1964)
Leach Company v. General Sani-Can Manufacturing Corporation
393 F.2d 183 (Seventh Circuit, 1968)
The Welch Scientific Company v. The Human Engineering Institute, Inc.
416 F.2d 32 (Seventh Circuit, 1970)
Celgene Corporation v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
17 F.4th 1111 (Federal Circuit, 2021)
Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc.
400 F. Supp. 1325 (D. Massachusetts, 1975)
Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.
261 F. Supp. 648 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Solo Cup Company v. Paper MacHinery Corporation, Ralph O. Martin and John R. Baumgartner
359 F.2d 754 (Seventh Circuit, 1966)
Latini v. RM Dubin Corporation
90 F. Supp. 212 (N.D. Illinois, 1950)
McGah v. VM CORPORATION
166 F. Supp. 662 (N.D. Illinois, 1958)
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Electronics Corp.
290 F. Supp. 308 (C.D. California, 1968)
American Can Co. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.
433 F. Supp. 333 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1977)
The Bobrick Corporation v. American Dispenser Co., Inc.
377 F.2d 334 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Epsco, Incorporated
224 F. Supp. 260 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)
Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Molins Organizations, Ltd.
261 F. Supp. 436 (E.D. Virginia, 1966)
In re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent Litigation
750 F. Supp. 330 (N.D. Illinois, 1990)
Olshansky v. Thyer Mfg. Corp.
13 F.R.D. 227 (N.D. Illinois, 1952)
Kerr v. Port Huron Sulphite and Paper Co.
157 F. Supp. 685 (D. New Jersey, 1957)
Appleton v. Ronson Service of Illinois, Inc.
297 F. Supp. 868 (N.D. Illinois, 1968)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 945.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §109 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §48, 36 Stat. 1100).
Venue provisions of section 109 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appear in section 1400 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §109 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §48, 36 Stat. 1100).
Venue provisions of section 109 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., appear in section 1400 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.