FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 97

Findings and declaration of purpose

28 U.S.C. § 1602
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter97 — JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITIES OF FOREIGN STATES

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1602 (Findings and declaration of purpose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1602.

Text

The Congress finds that the determination by United States courts of the claims of foreign states to immunity from the jurisdiction of such courts would serve the interests of justice and would protect the rights of both foreign states and litigants in United States courts. Under international law, states are not immune from the jurisdiction of foreign courts insofar as their commercial activities are concerned, and their commercial property may be levied upon for the satisfaction of judgments rendered against them in connection with their commercial activities. Claims of foreign states to immunity should henceforth be decided by courts of the United States and of the States in conformity with the principles set forth in this chapter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
542 U.S. 692 (Supreme Court, 2004)
1,114 case citations
Republic of Austria v. Altmann
541 U.S. 677 (Supreme Court, 2004)
410 case citations
Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
551 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 2007)
379 case citations
Rote v. Zel Custom Manufacturing LLC
816 F.3d 383 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
114 case citations
Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations v. City of New York
551 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 2007)
110 case citations
Hilska v. Jones
217 F.R.D. 16 (District of Columbia, 2003)
93 case citations
United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development
445 F.3d 771 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
78 case citations
Jesus Hernandez v. Unknown Named Agents, et
785 F.3d 117 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
51 case citations
Yang Rong v. Liaoning Province Government
452 F.3d 883 (D.C. Circuit, 2006)
32 case citations
El-Hadad v. United Arab Emirates
496 F.3d 658 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
32 case citations
Wamai v. Republic of Sudan
174 F. Supp. 3d 242 (District of Columbia, 2016)
30 case citations
Holden v. Canadian Consulate
92 F.3d 918 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
28 case citations
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, Plc
487 F.3d 1193 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
26 case citations
Corporacion Venezolana De Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp.
477 F. Supp. 615 (S.D. New York, 1979)
24 case citations
Hausler v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
770 F.3d 207 (Second Circuit, 2014)
18 case citations
Stephens v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.
69 F.3d 1226 (Second Circuit, 1995)
14 case citations
Olsen v. Government of Mexico
729 F.2d 641 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
14 case citations
Exchange National Bank v. Empresa Minera Del Centro Del Peru S.A.
595 F. Supp. 502 (S.D. New York, 1984)
12 case citations
Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG
920 F. Supp. 2d 517 (S.D. New York, 2013)
12 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 94–583, §4(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2892.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Pub. L. 94–583, §8, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2898, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and section 1330 of this title, amending sections 1332, 1391, and 1441 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and section 1 of this title] shall take effect ninety days after the date of its enactment [Oct. 21, 1976]."

Short Title
For short title of Pub. L. 94–583 as the "Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976", see section 1 of Pub. L. 94–583, set out as a Short Title of 1976 Amendments note under section 1 of this title.

Separability
Pub. L. 94–583, §7, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2898, provided that: "If any provision of this Act [enacting this chapter and section 1330 of this title, amending sections 1332, 1391, and 1441 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and section 1 of this title] or the application thereof to any foreign state is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the Act which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Act are severable."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1602.