FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 89
Patent, plant variety protection, and copyright cases
28 U.S.C. § 1454
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter89 — DISTRICT COURTS; REMOVAL OF CASES FROM STATE COURTS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1454 (Patent, plant variety protection, and copyright cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1454.
Text
(a)In General.—A civil action in which any party asserts a claim for relief arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, plant variety protection, or copyrights may be removed to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where the action is pending.
(b)Special Rules.—The removal of an action under this section shall be made in accordance with section 1446, except that if the removal is based solely on this section—
(1)the action may be removed by any party; and
(2)the time limitations contained in section 1446(b) may be extended at any time for cause shown.
(c)Clarification of Jurisdiction in Certain Cases.—The court to which a civil action is removed under this section is not precluded from hearing and determining any claim in
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas E. Reynolds v. Behrman Capital IV L.P.
988 F.3d 1314 (Eleventh Circuit, 2021)
Kelly v. Warminster Township Board of Supervisors
512 F. Supp. 658 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Andrews v. Daughtry
994 F. Supp. 2d 728 (M.D. North Carolina, 2014)
Acorne Productions, LLC v. Tjeknavorian
33 F. Supp. 3d 175 (E.D. New York, 2014)
Preston v. Nagel
857 F.3d 1382 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Badhwa v. Veritec, Inc.
367 F. Supp. 3d 890 (D. Maine, 2018)
Hanson v. Randall
(W.D. Arkansas, 2018)
US HEALTH DRUG STORE INC. v. PIERRE FABRE USA, INC.
(D. New Jersey, 2024)
ScriptChek Visual Verification Systems, Inc. v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
(S.D. Florida, 2021)
Erdman v. Falkner
(S.D. Alabama, 2019)
BioCorRx, Inc. v. VDM BioChemicals, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2021)
Ameranth, Inc. v. ChowNow, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2021)
Nextpulse, LLC v. Brunswick Corporation
(N.D. California, 2023)
Recif Resources, LLC v. Juniper Capital Advisors, LP
(S.D. Texas, 2019)
AEP Excluded AssetCo, LLC v. Bellanergy, LLC
(S.D. Texas, 2024)
NVR Branding Corporation v. Korth
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2024)
BeckerSmith Medical, Inc. v. Quinton Bickley
(C.D. California, 2023)
Basf Plant Science, Lp v. Commonwealth Scientific
(Federal Circuit, 2022)
Eco Fiber Inc. v. Yukon Packaging, LLC
(W.D. North Carolina, 2024)
DRIT LP v. Glaxo Group Limited
(D. Delaware, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 112–29, §19(c)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 332.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section applicable to any civil action commenced on or after Sept. 16, 2011, see section 19(e) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment note under section 1295 of this title.
Effective Date
Section applicable to any civil action commenced on or after Sept. 16, 2011, see section 19(e) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment note under section 1295 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1454.