FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 89
Attachment or sequestration; securities
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure·Ch. 89 — DISTRICT COURTS; REMOVAL OF CASES FROM STATE COURTS
Whenever any action is removed from a State court to a district court of the United States, any attachment or sequestration of the goods or estate of the defendant in such action in the State court shall hold the goods or estate to answer the final judgment or decree in the same manner as they would have been held to answer final judgment or decree had it been rendered by the State court.
All bonds, undertakings, or security given by either party in such action prior to its removal shall remain valid and effectual notwithstanding such removal.
All injunctions, orders, and other proceedings had in such action prior to its removal shall remain in full force and effect until dissolved or modified by the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 1450 (Attachment or sequestration; securities) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70
415 U.S. 423 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers
390 U.S. 557 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Nissho-Iwai American Corporation v. R. Sukarno Kline, Individually and D/B/A Frankenburg Import-Export Ltd.
845 F.2d 1300 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Hyde Park Partners, L.P. v. Connolly
839 F.2d 837 (First Circuit, 1988)
Payne v. Churchich
161 F.3d 1030 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)
Maseda v. Honda Motor Co.
861 F.2d 1248 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.
832 F.2d 1080 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Jenkins v. MTGLQ Investors
218 F. App'x 719 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
Welk v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
850 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D. Minnesota, 2012)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bay Street Development Corp.
32 F.3d 636 (First Circuit, 1994)
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Salzman
751 P.2d 489 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1988)
Colonial Bank & Trust Co. v. Cahill
424 F. Supp. 1200 (N.D. Illinois, 1976)
Sawyer v. USAA Insurance
839 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (D. New Mexico, 2012)
General Electric Company v. Local Union 191, Affiliated With International Union of Electrical Radio and MacHine Workers (Afl-Cio)
413 F.2d 964 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Alloyd General Corporation v. Building Leasing Corporation
361 F.2d 359 (First Circuit, 1966)
Laney v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
259 F.R.D. 562 (N.D. Oklahoma, 2009)
Major v. General Motors Corp.
742 F. Supp. 1355 (M.D. Tennessee, 1990)
Dunbar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
853 F. Supp. 2d 839 (D. Minnesota, 2012)
Canino v. Londres
862 F. Supp. 685 (D. New Hampshire, 1994)
Tanko v. Saperstein
149 F. Supp. 317 (N.D. Illinois, 1957)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 940.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §79 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §36, 36 Stat. 1098).
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §79 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §36, 36 Stat. 1098).
Changes were made in phraseology.