FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 87
Internal revenue taxes
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Any civil action for the collection of internal revenue taxes may be brought in the district where the liability for such tax accrues, in the district of the taxpayer's residence, or in the district where the return was filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 1396 (Internal revenue taxes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ve Holding Corporation v. Johnson Gas Appliance Company
917 F.2d 1574 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
Marve A. Dubin v. United States
380 F.2d 813 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Berkowitz
328 F.2d 358 (Third Circuit, 1964)
Mayo Clinic, Edward S. Judd and D. O. Ferris v. Edward Kaiser
383 F.2d 653 (Eighth Circuit, 1967)
Caleshu v. United States
570 F.2d 711 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
Schwarz v. United States
191 F.2d 618 (Fourth Circuit, 1951)
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
340 F. Supp. 400 (S.D. New York, 1971)
Shong Ching Lau v. Change
415 F. Supp. 627 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
United States v. Montreal Trust Co.
35 F.R.D. 216 (S.D. New York, 1964)
The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. United States
331 F.2d 29 (First Circuit, 1964)
Schoot v. United States
664 F. Supp. 293 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United States
110 F. Supp. 563 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1953)
United States v. Brody
213 F. Supp. 905 (D. Massachusetts, 1963)
Jerrytone v. Musto
167 F. App'x 295 (Third Circuit, 2006)
Haire v. Miller
447 F. Supp. 57 (N.D. Mississippi, 1977)
United States v. Wood
658 F. Supp. 1561 (W.D. Kentucky, 1987)
Caremark, Inc. v. Goetz
395 F. Supp. 2d 683 (M.D. Tennessee, 2005)
United States v. M. Jeanne Stone
59 F.R.D. 260 (D. Delaware, 1973)
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United States
311 F. Supp. 860 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)
Nowell v. Nowell
296 F. Supp. 640 (D. Massachusetts, 1968)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 936.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §105, and section 3744 of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §44, 36 Stat. 1100; Feb. 10, 1939, ch. 2, §3744, 53 Stat. 460).
Section consolidates section 3744 of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code, with section 105 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
Words "or in the district where the return was filed" are new. This extension of venue will permit of an action in a district easily determinable for collection of revenue earned in several districts, or States, but the return for which is filed with one collector.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
While section 3744 of Title 26, U.S.C., Internal Revenue Code [1939], is one of the sources of this section, it was eliminated from the schedule of repeals by Senate amendment. Therefore, it remains in Title 26 [I.R.C. 1939]. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §105, and section 3744 of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §44, 36 Stat. 1100; Feb. 10, 1939, ch. 2, §3744, 53 Stat. 460).
Section consolidates section 3744 of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code, with section 105 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
Words "or in the district where the return was filed" are new. This extension of venue will permit of an action in a district easily determinable for collection of revenue earned in several districts, or States, but the return for which is filed with one collector.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
While section 3744 of Title 26, U.S.C., Internal Revenue Code [1939], is one of the sources of this section, it was eliminated from the schedule of repeals by Senate amendment. Therefore, it remains in Title 26 [I.R.C. 1939]. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.