FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 87

Internal revenue taxes

28 U.S.C. § 1396
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter87 — DISTRICT COURTS; VENUE

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1396 (Internal revenue taxes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1396.

Text

Any civil action for the collection of internal revenue taxes may be brought in the district where the liability for such tax accrues, in the district of the taxpayer's residence, or in the district where the return was filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ve Holding Corporation v. Johnson Gas Appliance Company
917 F.2d 1574 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
227 case citations
Marve A. Dubin v. United States
380 F.2d 813 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
145 case citations
United States v. Berkowitz
328 F.2d 358 (Third Circuit, 1964)
121 case citations
Mayo Clinic, Edward S. Judd and D. O. Ferris v. Edward Kaiser
383 F.2d 653 (Eighth Circuit, 1967)
84 case citations
Caleshu v. United States
570 F.2d 711 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
24 case citations
Schwarz v. United States
191 F.2d 618 (Fourth Circuit, 1951)
24 case citations
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
340 F. Supp. 400 (S.D. New York, 1971)
24 case citations
Shong Ching Lau v. Change
415 F. Supp. 627 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
22 case citations
United States v. Montreal Trust Co.
35 F.R.D. 216 (S.D. New York, 1964)
19 case citations
The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. United States
331 F.2d 29 (First Circuit, 1964)
17 case citations
Schoot v. United States
664 F. Supp. 293 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
16 case citations
Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston, Pa. v. United States
110 F. Supp. 563 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1953)
12 case citations
United States v. Brody
213 F. Supp. 905 (D. Massachusetts, 1963)
10 case citations
Jerrytone v. Musto
167 F. App'x 295 (Third Circuit, 2006)
8 case citations
Haire v. Miller
447 F. Supp. 57 (N.D. Mississippi, 1977)
7 case citations
United States v. Wood
658 F. Supp. 1561 (W.D. Kentucky, 1987)
7 case citations
Caremark, Inc. v. Goetz
395 F. Supp. 2d 683 (M.D. Tennessee, 2005)
6 case citations
United States v. M. Jeanne Stone
59 F.R.D. 260 (D. Delaware, 1973)
5 case citations
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. United States
311 F. Supp. 860 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)
4 case citations
Nowell v. Nowell
296 F. Supp. 640 (D. Massachusetts, 1968)
4 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 936.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §105, and section 3744 of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §44, 36 Stat. 1100; Feb. 10, 1939, ch. 2, §3744, 53 Stat. 460).
Section consolidates section 3744 of title 26, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Internal Revenue Code, with section 105 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
Words "or in the district where the return was filed" are new. This extension of venue will permit of an action in a district easily determinable for collection of revenue earned in several districts, or States, but the return for which is filed with one collector.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Senate Revision Amendment
While section 3744 of Title 26, U.S.C., Internal Revenue Code [1939], is one of the sources of this section, it was eliminated from the schedule of repeals by Senate amendment. Therefore, it remains in Title 26 [I.R.C. 1939]. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1396.