FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85

Seizures not within admiralty and maritime jurisdiction

28 U.S.C. § 1356
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1356 (Seizures not within admiralty and maritime jurisdiction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1356.

Text

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any seizure under any law of the United States on land or upon waters not within admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Republic National Bank of Miami v. United States
506 U.S. 80 (Supreme Court, 1992)
339 case citations
James A. Murray v. United States
686 F.2d 1320 (Eighth Circuit, 1982)
66 case citations
Beghin-Say International Inc. v. Ole-Bendt Rasmussen
733 F.2d 1568 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
59 case citations
In The Matter Of The Tax Indebtedness Of Dell W. Carlson
580 F.2d 1365 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
51 case citations
Vector Research, Inc. v. Howard & Howard Attorneys P.C.
76 F.3d 692 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
44 case citations
Fiore v. Walden
688 F.3d 558 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
36 case citations
R.J.F. Fabrics, Inc. v. United States
651 F. Supp. 1431 (Court of International Trade, 1986)
18 case citations
Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. U.S. Customs & Border Protection
801 F. Supp. 2d 383 (D. Maryland, 2011)
10 case citations
King v. United States
495 F. Supp. 334 (D. Nebraska, 1980)
9 case citations
Milin Industries, Inc. v. United States
691 F. Supp. 1454 (Court of International Trade, 1988)
9 case citations
CDCOM (U.S.A.) International, Inc. v. United States
21 Ct. Int'l Trade 435 (Court of International Trade, 1997)
8 case citations
Jose Troconis-Escovar v. United States
59 F.4th 273 (Seventh Circuit, 2023)
6 case citations
Linarez v. United States Department of Justice
2 F.3d 208 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
5 case citations
Cbb Group, Inc. v. United States
783 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (Court of International Trade, 2011)
5 case citations
United States v. Robert E. Landweer & Co.
816 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (Court of International Trade, 2012)
5 case citations
Fischer v. United States
96 Fed. Cl. 70 (Federal Claims, 2011)
4 case citations
United States v. United States District Court
580 F.2d 1365 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
4 case citations
Wright v. United States
902 F. Supp. 486 (S.D. New York, 1995)
4 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §508, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(3) and 371(4) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 3, 256, par. 4, 36 Stat. 1091, 1160; Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 97, §1, 40 Stat. 395; June 10, 1922, ch. 216, §1, 42 Stat. 634).
Section consolidates certain provisions of sections 41(3) and 371(4) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such sections are incorporated in section 1333 of this title.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1356.