FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85

Fine, penalty or forfeiture

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure·Ch. 85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
(a)The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any action or proceeding for the recovery or enforcement of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, incurred under any Act of Congress, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.
(b)(1) A forfeiture action or proceeding may be brought in—
(A)the district court for the district in which any of the acts or omissions giving rise to the forfeiture occurred, or
(B)any other district where venue for the forfeiture action or proceeding is specifically provided for in section 1395 of this title or any other statute.
(2)Whenever property subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States is located in a fore

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

28 U.S.C. § 1355 (Fine, penalty or forfeiture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. 51 Pieces of Real Property
17 F.3d 1306 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
52 case citations
Haas v. Pittsburgh National Bank
60 F.R.D. 604 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
20 case citations
Pentax Corp. v. Myhra
72 F.3d 708 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
13 case citations
United States v. 105,800 Shares of Common Stock of FirstRock Bancorp, Inc.
825 F. Supp. 191 (N.D. Illinois, 1993)
8 case citations
United States v. Fourteen Various Firearms
897 F. Supp. 271 (E.D. Virginia, 1995)
7 case citations
Gore v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
883 So. 2d 1225 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)
6 case citations
United States v. Various Tracts of Land in Muskogee & Cherokee Counties
74 F.3d 197 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
2 case citations
United States v. Tammy Wilson
116 F. App'x 51 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
2 case citations
United States v. Bayley
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
United States v. Hartog
(Ninth Circuit, 2008)
State v. Sanders
(Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §507, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, §1521, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4062.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(9) and 371(2) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 9, 256, par. 2, 36 Stat. 1092, 1160).
Word "fine" was inserted so that this section will apply to the many provisions in the United States Code for fines which are essentially civil. (See, also, section 2461 of this title and reviser's note thereunder.)
Words "pecuniary or otherwise" were added to make this section expressly applicable to both pecuniary and property forfeitures. The original section was so construed in Miller v. United States, 1870, 11 Wall. 268, 20 L.Ed. 135; Tyler v. Defrees, 1870, 11 Wall. 331, and The Rosemary, C.C.A. 1928, 26 F.2d 354, certiorari denied 49 S.Ct. 23, 278 U.S. 619, 73 L.Ed. 542.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1992—Pub. L. 102–550 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) to (d).
1980—Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.