FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Partition action where United States is joint tenant
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action commenced by any tenant in common or joint tenant for the partition of lands where the United States is one of the tenants in common or joint tenants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 U.S.C. § 1347 (Partition action where United States is joint tenant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San Diego
346 U.S. 556 (Supreme Court, 1954)
Walter Fuller Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. The Republic of the Philippines and the Philippines Presidential Commission on Good Government
965 F.2d 1375 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
National Treasury Employees Union v. Alan K. Campbell, Chairman, United States Civil Service Commission
589 F.2d 669 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
Lloyd R. Stubbs, Individually and as Administrator of the Estates of John R. Stubbs and Mary E. Stubbs v. United States
620 F.2d 775 (Tenth Circuit, 1980)
James E. Folsom v. United States
306 F.2d 361 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Frances C. Prater v. United States
612 F.2d 157 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
In Re Green River Drainage Area
147 F. Supp. 127 (D. Utah, 1956)
Kingsbury v. United States
563 F.2d 1019 (Court of Claims, 1977)
Murphy v. United States
121 F. Supp. 2d 21 (District of Columbia, 2000)
Jones v. United States
127 F. Supp. 31 (E.D. North Carolina, 1954)
Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States
604 F.2d 295 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)
Buchler v. United States
384 F. Supp. 709 (E.D. California, 1974)
Maktyniuk v. Pennsylvania
282 F. Supp. 252 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1968)
Lombard v. United States
28 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D. Massachusetts, 1998)
Kean v. Adler
65 F. App'x 408 (Third Circuit, 2003)
Schueler v. Rayjas Enterprises, Inc.
847 F. Supp. 1147 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Adria Smith Stanton v. United States of America
434 F.2d 1273 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Bradford v. United States Department of Agriculture
606 F. App'x 259 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
Price v. United States
7 F.3d 968 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
Batula v. United States
649 F. Supp. 1526 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1986)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 933.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(25) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 25, 36 Stat. 1094).
The venue provision in section 41(25) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is incorporated in section 1399 of this title.
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits in equity," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A change was made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(25) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 25, 36 Stat. 1094).
The venue provision in section 41(25) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is incorporated in section 1399 of this title.
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits in equity," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A change was made in phraseology.