FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Postal matters
28 U.S.C. § 1339
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1339 (Postal matters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1339.
Text
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to the postal service.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.
405 U.S. 538 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal Service
467 U.S. 512 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Jose J. Roman v. United States Postal Service
821 F.2d 382 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)
Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United States
674 F.2d 1155 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Jones
336 U.S. 641 (Supreme Court, 1949)
George Kurzon D/B/A Uxbridge Products Company v. United States Postal Service
539 F.2d 788 (First Circuit, 1976)
Alfred D. Schiaffo, in No. 72-2168 v. Henry Helstoski, in No. 72-2167
492 F.2d 413 (Third Circuit, 1974)
Peoples Gas, Light & Coke Co. v. United States Postal Service
658 F.2d 1182 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)
Tracy Owen v. John G. Mulligan
640 F.2d 1130 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
John J. Hoellen v. Frank Annunzio
468 F.2d 522 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
Johanna Kipperman v. Academy Life Insurance Company
554 F.2d 377 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
William Leighton v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, Barney Balaban, Edwin Weisl and Paul E. Manheim
340 F.2d 859 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Employees Welfare Committee v. E. H. Daws, Postmaster and Area Director U. S. Postal Service
599 F.2d 1375 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
NAACP (ATLANTA LOC.) v. United States Postal Serv.
398 F. Supp. 562 (N.D. Georgia, 1975)
Reese Bros. v. United States Postal Service
477 F. Supp. 2d 31 (District of Columbia, 2007)
Withers v. United States Postal Service
417 F. Supp. 1 (W.D. Missouri, 1976)
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
524 F. Supp. 1235 (D. Delaware, 1981)
Lutz v. United States Postal Service
538 F. Supp. 1129 (E.D. New York, 1982)
Catalano v. Department of Hospitals of City of New York
299 F. Supp. 166 (S.D. New York, 1969)
O'Connor v. Yezukevicz
589 F.2d 16 (First Circuit, 1978)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 932.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(6) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 6, 36 Stat. 1092).
Changes were made in phraseology.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(6) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 6, 36 Stat. 1092).
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1339.