FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs
28 U.S.C. § 1337
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1337 (Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1337.
Text
(a)The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or proceeding arising under any Act of Congress regulating commerce or protecting trade and commerce against restraints and monopolies: Provided, however, That the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of an action brought under section 11706 or 14706 of title 49, only if the matter in controversy for each receipt or bill of lading exceeds $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
(b)Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where a plaintiff who files the case under section 11706 or 14706 of title 49, originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $10,000, computed without regard to any seto
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.
438 U.S. 59 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers
390 U.S. 557 (Supreme Court, 1968)
Cmax, Inc. v. Hall
300 F.2d 265 (Ninth Circuit, 1962)
Jerry L. Engleson v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
972 F.2d 1038 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Aspen Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, LLC v. Aspen Valley Hospital District
353 F.3d 832 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
Cmax, Inc., Also D. B. A. City Messenger of Hollywood and City Messenger Air Express v. Drewry Photocolor Corporation
295 F.2d 695 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)
William Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway and Park District of Peoria, Illinois, Defendants
583 F.2d 378 (Seventh Circuit, 1978)
Weisfeld v. Sun Chemical Corp.
210 F.R.D. 136 (D. New Jersey, 2002)
Felice v. Sever
985 F.2d 1221 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Briggs v. Sagers
424 F.2d 130 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
7 F.3d 902 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
On Track Transportation, Inc. v. Lakeside Warehouse & Trucking Inc.
245 F.R.D. 213 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
Milberg v. Lawrence Cedarhurst Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
496 F.2d 523 (Second Circuit, 1974)
Lee v. Credit Management, LP.
846 F. Supp. 2d 716 (S.D. Texas, 2012)
Mitchell v. Floyd Pappin & Son, Inc.
122 F. Supp. 755 (D. Montana, 1954)
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Jay-Ann Company
228 F.2d 632 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)
Crews v. S & S Service Center Inc.
848 F. Supp. 2d 595 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
Citrin v. Erikson
911 F. Supp. 673 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Shupp v. Reading Blue Mountain
850 F. Supp. 2d 490 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
Blake v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
894 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. Tennessee, 1995)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 931; Pub. L. 95–486, §9(a), Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1633; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §505, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 97–449, §5(f), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2442; Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §305(a)(3), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 944.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(8), (23) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, pars. 8, 23, 36 Stat. 1092, 1093; Oct. 22, 1913, ch. 32, 38 Stat. 219).
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1995—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 104–88 substituted "11706 or 14706" for "11707".
1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "section 11707 of title 49" for "section 20(11) of part I of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 20(11)) or section 219 of part II of such Act (49 U.S.C. 319)" wherever appearing.
1980—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–417 added subsec. (c).
1978—Pub. L. 95–486 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted proviso giving the district courts original jurisdiction of actions brought under sections 20(11) and 219 of the Interstate Commerce Act when the amounts in controversy for each receipt exceed $10,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and added subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1995 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(8), (23) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, pars. 8, 23, 36 Stat. 1092, 1093; Oct. 22, 1913, ch. 32, 38 Stat. 219).
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1995—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 104–88 substituted "11706 or 14706" for "11707".
1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "section 11707 of title 49" for "section 20(11) of part I of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 20(11)) or section 219 of part II of such Act (49 U.S.C. 319)" wherever appearing.
1980—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–417 added subsec. (c).
1978—Pub. L. 95–486 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted proviso giving the district courts original jurisdiction of actions brought under sections 20(11) and 219 of the Interstate Commerce Act when the amounts in controversy for each receipt exceed $10,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and added subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1995 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1337.