FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85

Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs

28 U.S.C. § 1337
Title28Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1337 (Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1337.

Text

(a)The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or proceeding arising under any Act of Congress regulating commerce or protecting trade and commerce against restraints and monopolies: Provided, however, That the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of an action brought under section 11706 or 14706 of title 49, only if the matter in controversy for each receipt or bill of lading exceeds $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
(b)Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where a plaintiff who files the case under section 11706 or 14706 of title 49, originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $10,000, computed without regard to any seto

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.
438 U.S. 59 (Supreme Court, 1978)
1,928 case citations
Cmax, Inc. v. Hall
300 F.2d 265 (Ninth Circuit, 1962)
585 case citations
Jerry L. Engleson v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
972 F.2d 1038 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
113 case citations
Aspen Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, LLC v. Aspen Valley Hospital District
353 F.3d 832 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
53 case citations
Weisfeld v. Sun Chemical Corp.
210 F.R.D. 136 (D. New Jersey, 2002)
23 case citations
Felice v. Sever
985 F.2d 1221 (Third Circuit, 1993)
23 case citations
Briggs v. Sagers
424 F.2d 130 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
17 case citations
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
7 F.3d 902 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
16 case citations
On Track Transportation, Inc. v. Lakeside Warehouse & Trucking Inc.
245 F.R.D. 213 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2007)
11 case citations
Milberg v. Lawrence Cedarhurst Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
496 F.2d 523 (Second Circuit, 1974)
11 case citations
Lee v. Credit Management, LP.
846 F. Supp. 2d 716 (S.D. Texas, 2012)
9 case citations
Mitchell v. Floyd Pappin & Son, Inc.
122 F. Supp. 755 (D. Montana, 1954)
9 case citations
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Jay-Ann Company
228 F.2d 632 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)
5 case citations
Crews v. S & S Service Center Inc.
848 F. Supp. 2d 595 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
5 case citations
Citrin v. Erikson
911 F. Supp. 673 (S.D. New York, 1996)
4 case citations
Shupp v. Reading Blue Mountain
850 F. Supp. 2d 490 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
4 case citations
Blake v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
894 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. Tennessee, 1995)
4 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 931; Pub. L. 95–486, §9(a), Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1633; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, §505, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 97–449, §5(f), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2442; Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §305(a)(3), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 944.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(8), (23) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, pars. 8, 23, 36 Stat. 1092, 1093; Oct. 22, 1913, ch. 32, 38 Stat. 219).
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1995—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 104–88 substituted "11706 or 14706" for "11707".
1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "section 11707 of title 49" for "section 20(11) of part I of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. 20(11)) or section 219 of part II of such Act (49 U.S.C. 319)" wherever appearing.
1980—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–417 added subsec. (c).
1978—Pub. L. 95–486 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted proviso giving the district courts original jurisdiction of actions brought under sections 20(11) and 219 of the Interstate Commerce Act when the amounts in controversy for each receipt exceed $10,000, exclusive of interests and costs, and added subsec. (b).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1995 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.

Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980, and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1337.