FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 5
West Virginia
28 U.S.C. § 129
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter5 — DISTRICT COURTS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 129 (West Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 129.
Text
West Virginia is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia.
(a)The Northern District comprises the counties of Barbour, Berkeley, Braxton, Brooke, Calhoun, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Hampshire, Hancock, Hardy, Harrison, Jefferson, Lewis, Marion, Marshall, Mineral, Monongalia, Morgan, Ohio, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Preston, Randolph, Ritchie, Taylor, Tucker, Tyler, Upshur, Webster, and Wetzel.
Court for the Northern District shall be held at Clarksburg, Elkins, Fairmont, Martinsburg, and Wheeling.
(b)The Southern District comprises the counties of Boone, Cabell, Clay, Fayette, Greenbrier, Jackson, Kanawha, Lincoln, Logan, McDowell, Mason, Mercer, Mingo, Monroe, Nicholas, Putnam, Raleigh, Roane, Summers, Wayne, Wirt, Woo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crane v. Shalala
76 F.3d 251 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Mario Henry v. City of Erie
728 F.3d 275 (Third Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Gordon
168 F.3d 1222 (Tenth Circuit, 1999)
Mary Lois Tillman v. Edward Coley, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Bleckley County, Ga.
886 F.2d 317 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Gary Steven Florence
456 F.2d 46 (Fourth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Sean Michael Grier
449 F.3d 558 (Third Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Roy Harman
349 F.2d 316 (Fourth Circuit, 1965)
Nancy Johnson v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
969 F.2d 1082 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Woodruff v. Hamilton Township Public Schools
305 F. App'x 833 (Third Circuit, 2009)
Penoro v. Rederi A/B Disa
376 F.2d 125 (Second Circuit, 1967)
Senator Linie GMBH & Co. KG v. Sunway Line, Inc.
291 F.3d 145 (Second Circuit, 2002)
Roy Day v. Daniel Toner
530 F. App'x 118 (Third Circuit, 2013)
David Brown v. City of Ecorse
322 F. App'x 443 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Juan D. Berroa-Medrano A/K/A Kalin A/K/A Jose Rafael Rivero Jose Rivero
303 F.3d 277 (Third Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Christopher Steele
664 F. App'x 260 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Best Odds Corp. v. Ibus Media Ltd.
655 F. App'x 582 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Yigal Bosch v. Frost National Bank
494 F. App'x 463 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Boyd v. Rokosky
(S.D. West Virginia, 2024)
Overla 22546-040 v. United States
(W.D. Michigan, 2021)
Tubbs v. Saad
(S.D. Alabama, 2018)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 894; Pub. L. 97–471, §1, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2601.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §194 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §113, 36 Stat. 1129; Mar. 23, 1912, ch. 63, 37 Stat. 76; Aug. 22, 1914, ch. 265, 38 Stat. 702; Feb. 27, 1922, ch. 83, 42 Stat. 398; June 22, 1936, ch. 695, 49 Stat. 1805; Aug. 23, 1937, ch. 737, 50 Stat. 744; June 29, 1938, ch. 817, 52 Stat. 1245).
Words "with the waters thereof," after the list of counties in each district, were omitted as unnecessary, and in view of the absence of such words in similar sections relating to other States.
Provisions relating to special terms of court were omitted as covered by section 141 of this title.
A provision that the term at Fairmont be held "when suitable rooms and accommodations for holding terms of the court shall be furnished at Fairmont free of cost to the United States or until, subject to the recommendation of the Attorney General of the United States with respect to providing such rooms and accommodations for holding court at Fairmont, a Federal building containing such suitable rooms and accommodations for holding court shall be erected at such place," was omitted as obsolete on advice of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available.
Provisions respecting court accommodations at Beckley and Lewisburg were omitted as covered by section 142 of this title.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–471, §1(1), struck out references to Parkersburg, Wirt, and Wood counties and inserted references to Braxton, Pocahontas, and Webster counties.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–471, §1(2), struck out references to Braxton, Pocahontas, and Webster counties and inserted references to Parkersburg, Wirt, and Wood counties.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §194 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §113, 36 Stat. 1129; Mar. 23, 1912, ch. 63, 37 Stat. 76; Aug. 22, 1914, ch. 265, 38 Stat. 702; Feb. 27, 1922, ch. 83, 42 Stat. 398; June 22, 1936, ch. 695, 49 Stat. 1805; Aug. 23, 1937, ch. 737, 50 Stat. 744; June 29, 1938, ch. 817, 52 Stat. 1245).
Words "with the waters thereof," after the list of counties in each district, were omitted as unnecessary, and in view of the absence of such words in similar sections relating to other States.
Provisions relating to special terms of court were omitted as covered by section 141 of this title.
A provision that the term at Fairmont be held "when suitable rooms and accommodations for holding terms of the court shall be furnished at Fairmont free of cost to the United States or until, subject to the recommendation of the Attorney General of the United States with respect to providing such rooms and accommodations for holding court at Fairmont, a Federal building containing such suitable rooms and accommodations for holding court shall be erected at such place," was omitted as obsolete on advice of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available.
Provisions respecting court accommodations at Beckley and Lewisburg were omitted as covered by section 142 of this title.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–471, §1(1), struck out references to Parkersburg, Wirt, and Wood counties and inserted references to Braxton, Pocahontas, and Webster counties.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–471, §1(2), struck out references to Braxton, Pocahontas, and Webster counties and inserted references to Parkersburg, Wirt, and Wood counties.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/129.