FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 5

Washington

28 U.S.C. § 128

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 128 (Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 128.

Text

Washington is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Eastern and Western Districts of Washington.

(a)The Eastern District comprises the counties of Adams, Asotin, Benton, Chelan, Columbia, Douglas, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pend Oreille, Spokane, Stevens, Walla Walla, Whitman, and Yakima. Court for the Eastern District shall be held at Spokane, Yakima, Walla Walla, and Richland.
(b)The Western District comprises the counties of Clallam, Clark, Cowlitz, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Lewis, Mason, Pacific, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Thurston, Wahkiakum, and Whatcom. Court for the Western District shall be held at Bellingham, Seattle, Tacoma, Mount Vernon, and Vancouver.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lathan v. Brinegar
506 F.2d 677 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)
173 case citations
Ross Furlow v. United States
644 F.2d 764 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
48 case citations
Ali v. Ashcroft
346 F.3d 873 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
38 case citations
Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Inc. v. Bartlett
454 F.2d 613 (Third Circuit, 1971)
37 case citations
Citizens for Mass Transit Against Freeways v. Brinegar
357 F. Supp. 1269 (D. Arizona, 1973)
22 case citations
Rankin v. Coleman
394 F. Supp. 647 (E.D. North Carolina, 1975)
10 case citations
Forever Green Athletic Fields, Inc. v. Dawson
514 B.R. 768 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2014)
9 case citations
Sierra Club v. United States Department of Transportation
310 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (D. Nevada, 2004)
5 case citations
Arlington Coalition on Transportation v. Volpe
332 F. Supp. 1218 (E.D. Virginia, 1971)
2 case citations
Colvin v. Amegy Mortgage Co.
537 B.R. 310 (W.D. Texas, 2015)
1 case citations
Person v. Jones
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Martin v. Schneider
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Ramirez v. Gechy
(E.D. Texas, 2025)
McDavid v. Wilson
(N.D. Texas, 2021)
Davis v. Dome
(S.D. Texas, 2024)
Jallow v. Wells Fargo & Co.
(S.D. New York, 2022)
Ramirez v. Gechy
(M.D. Pennsylvania, 2025)

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 894; Pub. L. 87–699, Sept. 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 598; Pub. L. 91–272, §4, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 297; Pub. L. 110–161, div. D, title III, §308, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1990; Pub. L. 118–73, §2(b), July 30, 2024, 138 Stat. 1504.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §193 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §112, 36 Stat. 1128; June 15, 1937, ch. 351, 50 Stat. 260; Dec. 28, 1945, ch. 596, 59 Stat. 661).
Words "with the waters thereof," after the list of counties in each division, were omitted as unnecessary, and in view of the absence of such words in most similar sections relating to other States.
A provision relating to the maintenance of offices by the clerks were omitted as covered by section 751 of this title.
Provisions that the counties in both divisions of the eastern district included all Indian reservations in such counties and that the counties in both divisions of the western district included all Indian reservations in such counties were omitted as surplusage. (See Reviser's Note under section 114 of this title.)
Pend Oreille County of the northern division of the eastern district and Grays Harbor of the southern division of the western district were created since the enactment of the Judicial Code.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2024—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–73 inserted "Mount Vernon," after "Tacoma,".
2007—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–161 substituted "Bellingham, Seattle, Tacoma, and Vancouver" for "Bellingham, Seattle, and Tacoma".
1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–272, §4(a), struck out provisions which had divided Eastern District into a Northern Division and a Southern Division.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 91–272, §4(b), struck out provisions which had divided Western District into a Northern Division and a Southern Division.
1962—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 87–699 provided for holding court at Richland.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/128.