FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 5
Virginia
28 U.S.C. § 127
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter5 — DISTRICT COURTS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 127 (Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 127.
Text
Virginia is divided into two judicial districts, to be known as the Eastern and Western districts of Virginia.
(a)The Eastern District comprises the counties of Accomac, Amelia, Arlington, Brunswick, Caroline, Charles City, Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, Elizabeth City, Essex, Fairfax, Fauquier, Gloucester, Goochland, Greensville, Hanover, Henrico, Isle of Wight, James City, King and Queen, King George, King William, Lancaster, Loudoun, Lunenburg, Mathews, Mecklenburg, Middlesex, Nansemond, New Kent, Norfolk, Northampton, Northumberland, Nottoway, Powhatan, Prince Edward, Prince George, Prince William, Princess Anne, Richmond, Southampton, Spotsylvania, Stafford, Surry, Sussex, Warwick, Westmoreland, and York.
Court for the Eastern District shall be held at Alexandria, Newport News, Norfolk, an
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
266 F.3d 1155 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Alderman v. Chrysler Corp.
480 F. Supp. 600 (E.D. Virginia, 1979)
United States v. Lentz
352 F. Supp. 2d 718 (E.D. Virginia, 2005)
Dee-K Enterprises, Inc. v. Heveafil Sdn. Bhd.
985 F. Supp. 640 (E.D. Virginia, 1997)
Seagrave v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
848 F. Supp. 82 (E.D. Louisiana, 1994)
Caluyo v. DaVita, Inc.
938 F. Supp. 2d 67 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Lindner v. BiscayneAmericas Advisers L.L.C.
214 F. Supp. 3d 1307 (S.D. Florida, 2016)
Webster v. Potter
185 F. Supp. 3d 74 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Junius J. Joyner, III v. Carrol A. Weimer, Jr.
(C.D. California, 2024)
Mabe v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
(E.D. Tennessee, 2019)
Chestnut v. Lue
(W.D. Virginia, 2019)
Babb v. Hall
(E.D. Tennessee, 2021)
Bey v. United States Department of Justice
(D. South Carolina, 2024)
Pierre v. John Doe
(E.D. New York, 2024)
Susana V. Immigration & Customs Enforcement ("ICE")
(S.D. New York, 2021)
Jochen E. Pendleton v. Revature LLC et al.
(W.D. Washington, 2025)
Palmer v. San Francisco City Jail Sheriff
(N.D. California, 2022)
White v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
(S.D. New York, 2021)
Huffman v. C. Large
(W.D. Virginia, 2024)
Ingram Bey v. Warden
(W.D. Virginia, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 893; Pub. L. 90–383, July 5, 1968, 82 Stat. 292; Pub. L. 102–200, §1, Dec. 10, 1991, 105 Stat. 1630.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§192 and 192a, and section 403c–2 of title 16, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Conservation (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §111, 36 Stat. 1127; June 13, 1918, ch. 100, 40 Stat. 605; Apr. 30, 1924, ch. 144, 43 Stat. 114; Feb. 21, 1925, ch. 290, 43 Stat. 962; Jan. 20, 1930, ch. 20, §1, 46 Stat. 56; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §2, 50 Stat. 701; June 13, 1938, ch. 350, 52 Stat. 674; Oct. 31, 1945, ch. 443, §202, 59 Stat. 554).
A provision of section 192 of title 28 relating to the maintenance of offices by the clerk of the western district was omitted as covered by sections 452 and 751 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Senate Revision Amendment
By Senate amendment, "Newport News" was inserted after "Alexandria" in second paragraph of subsection (a) of this section. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–200, §1(1), struck out reference to Culpeper, Louisa, and Orange counties.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–200, §1(2), inserted reference to Culpeper, Louisa, and Orange counties.
1968—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 90–383 added subsec. (c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Applicability of 1991 Amendments
Pub. L. 102–200, §2, Dec. 10, 1991, 105 Stat. 1630, provided that:
"(a) Pending Actions.—The amendments made by section 1 [amending this section] shall not apply to any action commenced before the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 10, 1991] and pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on such date.
"(b) Juries.—The amendments made by section 1 shall not affect the composition, or preclude the service, of any grand or petit jury summoned, empaneled, or actually serving in the Eastern or Western District of Virginia on the date of the enactment of this Act."
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§192 and 192a, and section 403c–2 of title 16, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Conservation (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §111, 36 Stat. 1127; June 13, 1918, ch. 100, 40 Stat. 605; Apr. 30, 1924, ch. 144, 43 Stat. 114; Feb. 21, 1925, ch. 290, 43 Stat. 962; Jan. 20, 1930, ch. 20, §1, 46 Stat. 56; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §2, 50 Stat. 701; June 13, 1938, ch. 350, 52 Stat. 674; Oct. 31, 1945, ch. 443, §202, 59 Stat. 554).
A provision of section 192 of title 28 relating to the maintenance of offices by the clerk of the western district was omitted as covered by sections 452 and 751 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Senate Revision Amendment
By Senate amendment, "Newport News" was inserted after "Alexandria" in second paragraph of subsection (a) of this section. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–200, §1(1), struck out reference to Culpeper, Louisa, and Orange counties.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–200, §1(2), inserted reference to Culpeper, Louisa, and Orange counties.
1968—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 90–383 added subsec. (c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Applicability of 1991 Amendments
Pub. L. 102–200, §2, Dec. 10, 1991, 105 Stat. 1630, provided that:
"(a) Pending Actions.—The amendments made by section 1 [amending this section] shall not apply to any action commenced before the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 10, 1991] and pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on such date.
"(b) Juries.—The amendments made by section 1 shall not affect the composition, or preclude the service, of any grand or petit jury summoned, empaneled, or actually serving in the Eastern or Western District of Virginia on the date of the enactment of this Act."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/127.