FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 81
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces; certiorari
28 U.S.C. § 1259
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter81 — SUPREME COURT
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1259 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces; certiorari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1259.
Text
Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari in the following cases:
(1)Cases reviewed by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces under section 867(a)(1) of title 10.
(2)Cases certified to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces by the Judge Advocate General under section 867(a)(2) of title 10.
(3)Cases in which the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces granted or refused to grant a petition for review under section 867(a)(3) of title 10.
(4)Cases, other than those described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this subsection, in which the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces granted or refused to grant relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Denedo
556 U.S. 904 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Solorio v. United States
483 U.S. 435 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Ali Hamza Ahmad al Bahlul v. United States
792 F.3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2015)
Denedo v. United States
66 M.J. 114 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2008)
United States v. Lopez de Victoria
66 M.J. 67 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2008)
Gene A. Williams v. Secretary of the Navy
787 F.2d 552 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Able v. United States
155 F.3d 628 (Second Circuit, 1998)
Unger v. Ziemniak
27 M.J. 349 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1989)
Philips v. Perry
106 F.3d 1420 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Center for Constitutional Rights v. United States
72 M.J. 126 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)
United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review v. Carlucci
26 M.J. 328 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1988)
Loving v. United States
68 M.J. 1 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2009)
Mychelle Davis v. John O. Marsh, Secretary of the Army
876 F.2d 1446 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Sanford v. United States
586 F.3d 28 (D.C. Circuit, 2009)
McKinney v. Caldera
141 F. Supp. 2d 25 (District of Columbia, 2001)
United States v. Curtis
52 M.J. 166 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 1999)
Timothy Hennis v. Frank Hemlick
666 F.3d 270 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)
Wilson v. Courter
46 M.J. 745 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 1997)
United States v. Civilian ALAA MOHAMMAD ALI
70 M.J. 514 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2011)
United States v. Dowty
46 M.J. 845 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1997)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 98–209, §10(a)(1), Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1405; amended Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XIII, §1304(b)(3), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1577; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, §924(d)(1)(C), (2)(A), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2832; Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §533(a)(1), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 261.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2023—Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 118–31 inserted "or refused to grant" after "granted".
1994—Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces" for "Court of Military Appeals" in section catchline and wherever appearing in text.
1989—Pub. L. 101–189 substituted "section 867(a)(1)" for "section 867(b)(1)" in par. (1), "section 867(a)(2)" for "section 867(b)(2)" in par. (2), and "section 867(a)(3)" for "section 867(b)(3)" in par. (3).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2023 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 118–31(a) effective on the date that is one year after Dec. 22, 2023, and applicable with respect to any action of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in granting or refusing to grant a petition for review submitted to such Court for the first time on or after Dec. 22, 2023, with provisions relating to inapplicability to pending decisions and finality of decisions before effective date, see section 533(b) of Pub. L. 118–31, set out as a note under section 867a of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Effective Date
Section effective on the first day of the eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, see section 12(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as an Effective Date of 1983 Amendment note under section 801 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Amendments
2023—Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 118–31 inserted "or refused to grant" after "granted".
1994—Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces" for "Court of Military Appeals" in section catchline and wherever appearing in text.
1989—Pub. L. 101–189 substituted "section 867(a)(1)" for "section 867(b)(1)" in par. (1), "section 867(a)(2)" for "section 867(b)(2)" in par. (2), and "section 867(a)(3)" for "section 867(b)(3)" in par. (3).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2023 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 118–31(a) effective on the date that is one year after Dec. 22, 2023, and applicable with respect to any action of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in granting or refusing to grant a petition for review submitted to such Court for the first time on or after Dec. 22, 2023, with provisions relating to inapplicability to pending decisions and finality of decisions before effective date, see section 533(b) of Pub. L. 118–31, set out as a note under section 867a of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Effective Date
Section effective on the first day of the eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, see section 12(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as an Effective Date of 1983 Amendment note under section 801 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1259.