FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 5
New Mexico
28 U.S.C. § 111
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter5 — DISTRICT COURTS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 111 (New Mexico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 111.
Text
New Mexico constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Albuquerque, Las Cruces, Las Vegas, Roswell, Santa Fe, and Silver City.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State of Washington v. United States
87 F.2d 421 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.
157 F.2d 216 (Fifth Circuit, 1946)
Greenleaf v. Safeway Trails, Inc.
140 F.2d 889 (Second Circuit, 1944)
Standard Stoker Co. v. Lower
46 F.2d 678 (D. Maryland, 1931)
United States v. Reies Lopez Tijerina, Cristobal Lopez Tijerina, Jerry Noll, Ezekial Dominguez and Alfonso Chavez
407 F.2d 349 (Tenth Circuit, 1969)
Oxley v. Sweetland
94 F.2d 33 (Fourth Circuit, 1938)
Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
152 F.2d 753 (Third Circuit, 1945)
Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Baltimore & O. R.
12 F. Supp. 711 (D. Maryland, 1935)
Utilities Production Corporation v. Carter Oil Co.
72 F.2d 655 (Tenth Circuit, 1934)
Hazeltine Corporation v. White
68 F.2d 715 (Second Circuit, 1934)
Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co. of West Virginia v. Piedmont Coal Co.
33 F.2d 703 (Fourth Circuit, 1929)
Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
365 F.2d 802 (Third Circuit, 1966)
Wyoga Gas & Oil Corporation v. Schrack
27 F. Supp. 35 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1939)
Gall v. Brashier
169 F.2d 704 (Tenth Circuit, 1948)
Baldwin v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York
16 F. Supp. 918 (S.D. New York, 1936)
United States v. Waldman
835 F.3d 751 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Montana
92 F.2d 693 (Ninth Circuit, 1937)
State v. United States
87 F.2d 421 (Ninth Circuit, 1936)
McAlister v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
37 F. Supp. 956 (W.D. South Carolina, 1941)
National City Bank v. Harbin Electric Joint-Stock Co.
28 F.2d 468 (Ninth Circuit, 1928)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 885.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §177 (June 20, 1910, ch. 310, §13, 36 Stat. 565; Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 149, 41 Stat. 1361; June 7, 1924, ch. 332, 43 Stat. 642).
The reference to Raton as a place of holding court was omitted on advice of the clerk that court is no longer held there.
Provisions for furnishing rooms and accommodations at Las Vegas were omitted as obsolete upon advice of Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available.
Provision for adjournment or continuance in case of insufficient business by orders made anywhere in the district was omitted as covered by section 138 of this title.
Provisions for transfer of causes, civil or criminal, from one place of holding court to another were omitted. Such provisions, as to civil cases, are covered by section 1404 of this title, and, as to criminal cases, are rendered unnecessary because of inherent power of the court, and Rules 18–20 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, relating to venue.
Provisions for appointment of deputy clerks and deputy marshals and maintenance of offices at various cities were omitted as covered by sections 541 [see 561], 542 [see 561], and 751 of this title.
The provision respecting court accommodations at Silver City was omitted as covered by section 142 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §177 (June 20, 1910, ch. 310, §13, 36 Stat. 565; Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 149, 41 Stat. 1361; June 7, 1924, ch. 332, 43 Stat. 642).
The reference to Raton as a place of holding court was omitted on advice of the clerk that court is no longer held there.
Provisions for furnishing rooms and accommodations at Las Vegas were omitted as obsolete upon advice of Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available.
Provision for adjournment or continuance in case of insufficient business by orders made anywhere in the district was omitted as covered by section 138 of this title.
Provisions for transfer of causes, civil or criminal, from one place of holding court to another were omitted. Such provisions, as to civil cases, are covered by section 1404 of this title, and, as to criminal cases, are rendered unnecessary because of inherent power of the court, and Rules 18–20 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, relating to venue.
Provisions for appointment of deputy clerks and deputy marshals and maintenance of offices at various cities were omitted as covered by sections 541 [see 561], 542 [see 561], and 751 of this title.
The provision respecting court accommodations at Silver City was omitted as covered by section 142 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/111.