FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter Subchapter N—Tax Based on Income From Sources Within or Without the United States
Inter-company pricing rules
26 U.S.C. § 994
Title26 — Internal Revenue Code
ChapterSubchapter N—Tax Based on Income From Sources Within or Without the United States
PartSubpart A—Treatment of Qualifying Corporations
This text of 26 U.S.C. § 994 (Inter-company pricing rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 994.
Text
(a)In general
In the case of a sale of export property to a DISC by a person described in section 482, the taxable income of such DISC and such person shall be based upon a transfer price which would allow such DISC to derive taxable income attributable to such sale (regardless of the sales price actually charged) in an amount which does not exceed the greatest of—
(1)4 percent of the qualified export receipts on the sale of such property by the DISC plus 10 percent of the export promotion expenses of such DISC attributable to such receipts,
(2)50 percent of the combined taxable income of such DISC and such person which is attributable to the qualified export receipts on such property derived as the result of a sale by the DISC plus 10 percent of the export promotion expenses of such DI
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cwt Farms, Inc. And Cwt International, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
755 F.2d 790 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Dresser Industries, Inc. And Consolidated Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
911 F.2d 1128 (Fifth Circuit, 1990)
Boeing Co. v. United States
537 U.S. 437 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Bowater, Inc. And Subsidiaries, Formerly Known as Bowater Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
108 F.3d 12 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Anchor Hocking Corp. v. United States
11 Cl. Ct. 173 (Court of Claims, 1986)
General Motors Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue
938 P.2d 481 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1996)
Computervision Corp. v. Commissioner
164 F.3d 73 (First Circuit, 1999)
Dow Corning Corporation v. The United States
984 F.2d 416 (Federal Circuit, 1993)
Dresser Industries, Inc. v. United States
73 F. Supp. 2d 682 (N.D. Texas, 1999)
International Paper Co. v. United States
33 Fed. Cl. 384 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. United States
37 F.3d 321 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. United States
798 F. Supp. 505 (C.D. Illinois, 1992)
Hope v. United States
617 F. Supp. 439 (E.D. Louisiana, 1985)
Brown-Forman Corp. v. Commissioner
955 F.2d 1037 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
Brown-Forman Corporation v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue
955 F.2d 1037 (Sixth Circuit, 1992)
Rivera Casanova v. United States
(S.D. California, 2020)
Dow Corning Corp. v. United States
22 Cl. Ct. 184 (Court of Claims, 1990)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 92–178, title V, §501, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 543; amended Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
Amendments
1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/994.