FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter Subchapter B—Proceedings by Taxpayers and Third Parties
Civil damages for certain unauthorized collection actions
26 U.S.C. § 7433
Title26 — Internal Revenue Code
ChapterSubchapter B—Proceedings by Taxpayers and Third Parties
This text of 26 U.S.C. § 7433 (Civil damages for certain unauthorized collection actions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 7433.
Text
(a)In general
If, in connection with any collection of Federal tax with respect to a taxpayer, any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregards any provision of this title, or any regulation promulgated under this title, such taxpayer may bring a civil action for damages against the United States in a district court of the United States. Except as provided in section 7432, such civil action shall be the exclusive remedy for recovering damages resulting from such actions.
(b)Damages
In any action brought under subsection (a) or petition filed under subsection (e), upon a finding of liability on the part of the defendant, the defendant shall be liable to the plaintiff in an amount equal to the lesser of $1,000,000 (
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hudson Valley Black Press v. Internal Revenue Service
409 F.3d 106 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Rodriguez v. Shulman
844 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)
Cherbanaeff v. United States
77 Fed. Cl. 490 (Federal Claims, 2007)
Clyde W. Larue v. Collector of Internal Revenue
96 F.3d 1450 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
Portsmouth Ambulance, Inc. v. United States
943 F. Supp. 2d 806 (S.D. Ohio, 2013)
Friedmann v. Internal Revenue Service
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Pansier v. United States
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2020)
Corobbo v. Internal Revenue Service
228 F.R.D. 624 (S.D. Illinois, 2005)
Novoselsky v. United States
(E.D. Wisconsin, 2024)
Richard Mathis Doyle Mathis Leona Mathis Scot Mathis v. United States
113 F.3d 1238 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Amen Ra v. Internal Revenue Service
(N.D. Illinois, 2018)
Sikora v. Internal Revenue Service
(E.D. Michigan, 2020)
Lundberg v. United States of America
(District of Columbia, 2010)
Morrow v. United States Government
(District of Columbia, 2010)
Katisha Ednacot v. Mesa Medical Group, PLLC
(Sixth Circuit, 2015)
Kerwin Miller v. Timothy Sherrill
(Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Dacanay v. Government of Guam
(D. Guam, 2005)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, §6241(a), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3747; amended Pub. L. 104–168, title VIII, §§801(a), 802(a), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1465; Pub. L. 105–206, title III, §3102(a), (c), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 730.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 7433 was renumbered 7437 of this title.
Amendments
1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(a)(1)(A), inserted ", or by reason of negligence," after "recklessly or intentionally".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(a)(1)(B)(i), (c)(2), in introductory provisions, inserted "or petition filed under subsection (e)" after "subsection (a)" and inserted "($100,000, in the case of negligence)" after "$1,000,000".
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(a)(1)(B)(ii), inserted "or negligent" after "reckless or intentional".
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(a)(2), substituted "Requirement that administrative remedies be exhausted" for "Award for damages may be reduced if administrative remedies not exhausted" in heading and amended text of par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The amount of damages awarded under subsection (b) may be reduced if the court determines that the plaintiff has not exhausted the administrative remedies available to such plaintiff within the Internal Revenue Service."
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(c)(1), added subsec. (e).
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–168, §801(a), substituted "$1,000,000" for "$100,000".
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 104–168, §802(a), amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows:
"(1) Requirement that administrative remedies be exhausted.—A judgment for damages shall not be awarded under subsection (b) unless the court determines that the plaintiff has exhausted the administrative remedies available to such plaintiff within the Internal Revenue Service."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1998 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 105–206 applicable to actions of officers or employees of Internal Revenue Service after July 22, 1998, see section 3102(d) of Pub. L. 105–206, set out as a note under section 7426 of this title.
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–168, title VIII, §801(b), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1465, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to actions by officers or employees of the Internal Revenue Service after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 30, 1996]."
Pub. L. 104–168, title VIII, §802(b), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1465, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply in the case of proceedings commenced after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 30, 1996]."
Prior Provisions
A prior section 7433 was renumbered 7437 of this title.
Amendments
1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(a)(1)(A), inserted ", or by reason of negligence," after "recklessly or intentionally".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(a)(1)(B)(i), (c)(2), in introductory provisions, inserted "or petition filed under subsection (e)" after "subsection (a)" and inserted "($100,000, in the case of negligence)" after "$1,000,000".
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(a)(1)(B)(ii), inserted "or negligent" after "reckless or intentional".
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(a)(2), substituted "Requirement that administrative remedies be exhausted" for "Award for damages may be reduced if administrative remedies not exhausted" in heading and amended text of par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The amount of damages awarded under subsection (b) may be reduced if the court determines that the plaintiff has not exhausted the administrative remedies available to such plaintiff within the Internal Revenue Service."
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 105–206, §3102(c)(1), added subsec. (e).
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–168, §801(a), substituted "$1,000,000" for "$100,000".
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 104–168, §802(a), amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows:
"(1) Requirement that administrative remedies be exhausted.—A judgment for damages shall not be awarded under subsection (b) unless the court determines that the plaintiff has exhausted the administrative remedies available to such plaintiff within the Internal Revenue Service."
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1998 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 105–206 applicable to actions of officers or employees of Internal Revenue Service after July 22, 1998, see section 3102(d) of Pub. L. 105–206, set out as a note under section 7426 of this title.
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–168, title VIII, §801(b), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1465, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to actions by officers or employees of the Internal Revenue Service after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 30, 1996]."
Pub. L. 104–168, title VIII, §802(b), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1465, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply in the case of proceedings commenced after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 30, 1996]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 7433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/7433.