FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Continuation of partnership

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 26Internal Revenue Code·Ch. 1 — NORMAL TAXES AND SURTAXES·Subch. K·Pt. I
(a)General rule For purposes of this subchapter, an existing partnership shall be considered as continuing if it is not terminated.
(b)Termination
(1)General rule For purposes of subsection (a), a partnership shall be considered as terminated only if no part of any business, financial operation, or venture of the partnership continues to be carried on by any of its partners in a partnership.
(2)Special rules
(A)Merger or consolidation In the case of the merger or consolidation of two or more partnerships, the resulting partnership shall, for purposes of this section, be considered the continuation of any merging or consolidating partnership whose members own an interest of more than 50 percent in the capital and profits of the resulting partnership.
(B)Division of a partnership In th

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

26 U.S.C. § 708 (Continuation of partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bakersfield Energy Partners, LP v. Commissioner
568 F.3d 767 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
50 case citations
926 N. Ardmore Ave., LLC v. Cnty. of L. A.
396 P.3d 1036 (California Supreme Court, 2017)
33 case citations
CC & F Western Operations Ltd. Partnership v. Commissioner
273 F.3d 402 (First Circuit, 2001)
25 case citations
Garcia v. Foulger Pratt Development, Inc.
845 A.2d 16 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2003)
22 case citations
In Re Samoset Associates
14 B.R. 408 (D. Maine, 1981)
12 case citations
Calvin v. Siegal (In Re Siegal)
190 B.R. 639 (D. Arizona, 1996)
9 case citations
Victor A. Miller and Beatrice A. Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
285 F.2d 843 (Tenth Circuit, 1960)
9 case citations
Nevada Partners Fund, L.L.C. v. United States
720 F.3d 594 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
5 case citations
Kiesner v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Kiesner)
157 A.L.R. Fed. 759 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1996)
4 case citations
Ashland v. Commissioner
584 F. App'x 573 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
4 case citations
Mills v. Kochis
208 S.E.2d 352 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
3 case citations
Fensel v. United States
617 F. Supp. 22 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1985)
1 case citations
Pine Creek, LLC v. Pine Mount, LLC
558 S.E.2d 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
1 case citations
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Revenue Serv., No. Cv99-0495538s (Aug. 10, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 10895 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
926 North Ardmore v. County of L.A.
(California Supreme Court, 2017)

Source Credit

History

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 244; Pub. L. 115–97, title I, §13504(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2141.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2017—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 115–97 struck out dash after "only if" and subpar. (A) designation before "no part" and struck out subpar. (B) which read as follows: "within a 12-month period there is a sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the total interest in partnership capital and profits".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2017 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–97 applicable to partnership taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, see section 13504(c) of Pub. L. 115–97, set out as a note under section 168 of this title.