FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter Subchapter A—Additions to the Tax and Additional Amounts
Imposition of fraud penalty
26 U.S.C. § 6663
Title26 — Internal Revenue Code
ChapterSubchapter A—Additions to the Tax and Additional Amounts
PartII
This text of 26 U.S.C. § 6663 (Imposition of fraud penalty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 6663.
Text
(a)Imposition of penalty
If any part of any underpayment of tax required to be shown on a return is due to fraud, there shall be added to the tax an amount equal to 75 percent of the portion of the underpayment which is attributable to fraud.
(b)Determination of portion attributable to fraud
If the Secretary establishes that any portion of an underpayment is attributable to fraud, the entire underpayment shall be treated as attributable to fraud, except with respect to any portion of the underpayment which the taxpayer establishes (by a preponderance of the evidence) is not attributable to fraud.
(c)Special rule for joint returns
In the case of a joint return, this section shall not apply with respect to a spouse unless some part of the underpayment is due to the fraud of such spouse.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leo Goldman and Pauline Goldman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
39 F.3d 402 (Second Circuit, 1994)
Kawashima v. Holder
132 S. Ct. 1166 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Kevin J. Morse v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
419 F.3d 829 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Kenneth P. Kontny and Joann L. Kontny
238 F.3d 815 (Seventh Circuit, 2001)
George MacIel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
489 F.3d 1018 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Kosinski v. Commissioner
541 F.3d 671 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
Berkery v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
192 B.R. 835 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)
Joseph P. McGraw v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
384 F.3d 965 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Said Rum
995 F.3d 882 (Eleventh Circuit, 2021)
Larson v. United States
89 Fed. Cl. 363 (Federal Claims, 2009)
I & O Publishing Co., Inc., and Wallace Ward v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
131 F.3d 1314 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
Deanna Langille v. Commissioner of Irs
447 F. App'x 130 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
Goff v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Goff)
180 B.R. 193 (W.D. Tennessee, 1995)
Seini Liti Kolotolu Liti v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
289 F.3d 1103 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Bragg
582 F.3d 965 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Rossman v. United States (In re Rossman)
487 B.R. 18 (D. Massachusetts, 2012)
United States v. Krause (In Re Krause)
386 B.R. 785 (D. Kansas, 2008)
George v. Commissioner of IRS
837 F.3d 79 (First Circuit, 2016)
Montagne v. United States
90 Fed. Cl. 41 (Federal Claims, 2009)
Daoud v. Commissioner
548 F. App'x 441 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, §7721(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2397.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section applicable to returns the due date for which (determined without regard to extensions) is after Dec. 31, 1989, see section 7721(d) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as an Effective Date of 1989 Amendment note under section 461 of this title.
Effective Date
Section applicable to returns the due date for which (determined without regard to extensions) is after Dec. 31, 1989, see section 7721(d) of Pub. L. 101–239, set out as an Effective Date of 1989 Amendment note under section 461 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 6663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/6663.