FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter 55

Structured settlement factoring transactions

26 U.S.C. § 5891
Title26Internal Revenue Code
Chapter55 — STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT FACTORING TRANSACTIONS

This text of 26 U.S.C. § 5891 (Structured settlement factoring transactions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 5891.

Text

(a)Imposition of tax There is hereby imposed on any person who acquires directly or indirectly structured settlement payment rights in a structured settlement factoring transaction a tax equal to 40 percent of the factoring discount as determined under subsection (c)(4) with respect to such factoring transaction.
(b)Exception for certain approved transactions The tax under subsection (a) shall not apply in the case of a structured settlement factoring transaction in which the transfer of structured settlement payment rights is approved in advance in a qualified order. For purposes of this section, the term "qualified order" means a final order, judgment, or decree which—
(A)finds that the transfer described in paragraph (1)—
(i)does not contravene any Federal or State statute or the or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In RE RAPID SETTLEMENTS, LTD. v. BHG Structured Settlements, Inc.
202 S.W.3d 456 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
24 case citations
Symetra Life Insurance v. Rapid Settlements, Ltd.
599 F. Supp. 2d 809 (S.D. Texas, 2008)
14 case citations
Renaldo White v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company
104 F.4th 1182 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)
11 case citations
In Re Foreman
850 N.E.2d 387 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2006)
10 case citations
Annuity Transfers, Ltd. v. United States
86 Fed. Cl. 173 (Federal Claims, 2009)
5 case citations
Lujerio Cordero v. Transamerica Annuity Service Corporation
34 F.4th 994 (Eleventh Circuit, 2022)
4 case citations
Short v. Singer Asset Finance Co.
107 F. App'x 738 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
3 case citations
Barber, Z. v. Stanko, B.
2021 Pa. Super. 96 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2021)
2 case citations
Barber, J. v. Stanko, B.
2021 Pa. Super. 97 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2021)
2 case citations
Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. DRB Capital, LLC
562 S.W.3d 916 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)
2 case citations
Dean v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Co.
133 Wash. App. 350 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
1 case citations
Blazingstar Funding, LLC v. Dimitrius Wilson & a.
(Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2015)
In re Hilton
76 Pa. D. & C.4th 378 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 2005)
Matter of DRB Capital, LLC v. Hilario
2021 NY Slip Op 01508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 107–134, title I, §115(a), Jan. 23, 2002, 115 Stat. 2436.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Pub. L. 107–134, title I, §115(c), Jan. 23, 2002, 115 Stat. 2438, provided that:
"(1) In general.—The amendments made by this section [enacting this chapter] (other than the provisions of section 5891(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by this section) shall apply to structured settlement factoring transactions (as defined in section 5891(c) of such Code (as so added)) entered into on or after the 30th day following the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 23, 2002].
"(2) Clarification of existing law.—Section 5891(d) of such Code (as so added) shall apply to structured settlement factoring transactions (as defined in section 5891(c) of such Code (as so added)) entered into before, on, or after such 30th day.
"(3) Transition rule.—In the case of a structured settlement factoring transaction entered into during the period beginning on the 30th day following the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on July 1, 2002, no tax shall be imposed under section 5891(a) of such Code if—
"(A) the structured settlement payee is domiciled in a State (or possession of the United States) which has not enacted a statute providing that the structured settlement factoring transaction is ineffective unless the transaction has been approved by an order, judgment, or decree of a court (or where applicable, a responsible administrative authority) which finds that such transaction—
"(i) does not contravene any Federal or State statute or the order of any court (or responsible administrative authority); and
"(ii) is in the best interest of the structured settlement payee or is appropriate in light of a hardship faced by the payee; and
"(B) the person acquiring the structured settlement payment rights discloses to the structured settlement payee in advance of the structured settlement factoring transaction the amounts and due dates of the payments to be transferred, the aggregate amount to be transferred, the consideration to be received by the structured settlement payee for the transferred payments, the discounted present value of the transferred payments (including the present value as determined in the manner described in section 7520 of such Code), and the expenses required under the terms of the structured settlement factoring transaction to be paid by the structured settlement payee or deducted from the proceeds of such transaction."

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–589, §6(g)(3)(E), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3410, substituted "Jeopardy, receiverships, etc." for "Jeopardy, bankruptcy and receiverships" in item for chapter 70.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1966—Pub. L. 89–809, title III, §302(b), Nov. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 1588, added item VIII.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 5891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/5891.