FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter Subchapter G—Corporations Used to Avoid Income Tax on Shareholders
Deduction for deficiency dividends
26 U.S.C. § 547
Title26 — Internal Revenue Code
ChapterSubchapter G—Corporations Used to Avoid Income Tax on Shareholders
PartII
This text of 26 U.S.C. § 547 (Deduction for deficiency dividends) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 547.
Text
(a)General rule
If a determination (as defined in subsection (c)) with respect to a taxpayer establishes liability for personal holding company tax imposed by section 541 (or by a corresponding provision of a prior income tax law) for any taxable year, a deduction shall be allowed to the taxpayer for the amount of deficiency dividends (as defined in subsection (d)) for the purpose of determining the personal holding company tax for such year, but not for the purpose of determining interest, additional amounts, or assessable penalties computed with respect to such personal holding company tax.
(b)Rules for application of section
The deficiency dividend deduction shall be allowed as of the date the claim for the deficiency dividend deduction is filed.
If the allowance of a deficiency divid
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fulman v. United States
434 U.S. 528 (Supreme Court, 1978)
J.H. Rutter Rex Mfg. Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
853 F.2d 1275 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Nestlé Purina Petcare Co. v. Commissioner
594 F.3d 968 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Kluger Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner
617 F.2d 323 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Lx Cattle Company v. United States
629 F.2d 1096 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
C. Blake McDowell Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
652 F.2d 606 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)
Buder v. United States
332 F. Supp. 345 (E.D. Missouri, 1971)
In Re Dickson
114 B.R. 740 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1990)
Kluger Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Kluger, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, David and Bertha Kluger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
617 F.2d 323 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. CIR
(Eighth Circuit, 2010)
W.C. Garcia & Associates, Inc. v. The United States
988 F.2d 132 (Federal Circuit, 1993)
Source Credit
History
(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 191; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§1901(a)(78), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1777, 1834.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1976—Subsecs. (c)(3), (e), (g). Pub. L. 94–455, §1906(b)(13)(A), struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 94–455, §1901(a)(78), struck out subsec. (h) relating to the effective date of provisions concerning deduction of deficiency dividends.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by section 1901(a)(78) of Pub. L. 94–455 applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 1901(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Amendments
1976—Subsecs. (c)(3), (e), (g). Pub. L. 94–455, §1906(b)(13)(A), struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 94–455, §1901(a)(78), struck out subsec. (h) relating to the effective date of provisions concerning deduction of deficiency dividends.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by section 1901(a)(78) of Pub. L. 94–455 applicable with respect to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 1976, see section 1901(d) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/547.