FEDERAL · 26 U.S.C. · Chapter 14

Special valuation rules in case of transfers of interests in trusts

26 U.S.C. § 2702
Title26Internal Revenue Code
Chapter14 — SPECIAL VALUATION RULES

This text of 26 U.S.C. § 2702 (Special valuation rules in case of transfers of interests in trusts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
26 U.S.C. § 2702.

Text

(a)Valuation rules Solely for purposes of determining whether a transfer of an interest in trust to (or for the benefit of) a member of the transferor's family is a gift (and the value of such transfer), the value of any interest in such trust retained by the transferor or any applicable family member (as defined in section 2701(e)(2)) shall be determined as provided in paragraph (2). The value of any retained interest which is not a qualified interest shall be treated as being zero. The value of any retained interest which is a qualified interest shall be determined under section 7520. This subsection shall not apply to any transfer—
(i)if such transfer is an incomplete gift,
(ii)if such transfer involves the transfer of an interest in trust all the property in which consists of a resi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reams v. Vrooman-Fehn Printing Co.
140 F.2d 237 (Sixth Circuit, 1944)
36 case citations
Autrey v. Autrey
516 P.3d 207 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2022)
17 case citations
Judith Badgley v. United States
957 F.3d 969 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
16 case citations
United States v. McLain
646 F.3d 599 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
12 case citations
Hartley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
72 F.2d 352 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)
5 case citations
Patricia A. Schott, Stephen C. Schott v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
319 F.3d 1203 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
4 case citations
Harold Rosbottom, Jr. v. Gerald Schiff
701 F. App'x 330 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
In re Doman
110 A.D.3d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Ago
(Florida Attorney General Reports, 2003)
Jones v. Commissioner of Revenue Ser., No. Cv 00 0504070 S (Dec. 31, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 15334-cr (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, §11602(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–497; amended Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1702(f)(11), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1872.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a)(3)(A)(i). Pub. L. 104–188, §1702(f)(11)(A)(i), (ii), (B)(i), substituted "if" for "to the extent" and "incomplete gift" for "incomplete transfer", and struck out "or" at end.
Subsec. (a)(3)(A)(ii). Pub. L. 104–188, §1702(f)(11)(A)(iii), substituted ", or" for period at end.
Subsec. (a)(3)(A)(iii). Pub. L. 104–188, §1702(f)(11)(A)(iv), added cl. (iii).
Subsec. (a)(3)(B). Pub. L. 104–188, §1702(f)(11)(B), substituted "incomplete gift" for "incomplete transfer" in heading and text.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–188 effective, except as otherwise expressly provided, as if included in the provision of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990, Pub. L. 101–508, title XI, to which such amendment relates, see section 1702(i) of Pub. L. 104–188, set out as a note under section 38 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 U.S.C. § 2702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/26/2702.