FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—TREATIES
Future treaties with Indian tribes
25 U.S.C. § 71
Title25 — Indians
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—TREATIES
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 71 (Future treaties with Indian tribes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 71.
Text
No Indian nation or tribe within the territory of the United States shall be acknowledged or recognized as an independent nation, tribe, or power with whom the United States may contract by treaty; but no obligation of any treaty lawfully made and ratified with any such Indian nation or tribe prior to March 3, 1871, shall be hereby invalidated or impaired. Such treaties, and any Executive orders and Acts of Congress under which the rights of any Indian tribe to fish are secured, shall be construed to prohibit (in addition to any other prohibition) the imposition under any law of a State or political subdivision thereof of any tax on any income derived from the exercise of rights to fish secured by such treaty, Executive order, or Act of Congress if section 7873 of title 26 does not permit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
455 U.S. 130 (Supreme Court, 1982)
DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District
420 U.S. 425 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Organized Village of Kake v. Egan
369 U.S. 60 (Supreme Court, 1962)
County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation
502 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Michael Wang v. Robert Masaitis, U.S. Marshal
416 F.3d 992 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
362 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Antoine v. Washington
420 U.S. 194 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax Commission
380 U.S. 685 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana
472 U.S. 237 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Weicker
39 F.3d 51 (Second Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Jackie White
508 F.2d 453 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
Haaland v. Brackeen
599 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 2023)
Madeline Colliflower v. John Garland, Sheriff of County of Blaine
342 F.2d 369 (Ninth Circuit, 1965)
Anderson v. O'BRIEN
524 P.2d 390 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)
United States v. Michigan
471 F. Supp. 192 (W.D. Michigan, 1979)
Cayuga Nation v. Howard Tanner
6 F.4th 361 (Second Circuit, 2021)
Kahawaiolaa v. Norton
386 F.3d 1271 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. Hull
146 F. Supp. 2d 1012 (D. Arizona, 2001)
State v. Sebastian
701 A.2d 13 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)
Parravano v. Babbitt
70 F.3d 539 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Source Credit
History
(R.S. §2079; Pub. L. 100–647, title III, §3042, Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3641.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
R.S. §2079 derived from act Mar. 3, 1871, ch. 120, §1, 16 Stat. 566.
Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–647 inserted sentence at end relating to State tax treatment of income derived by Indians from exercise of fishing rights secured by treaties, Executive orders, or Acts of Congress.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–647 applicable to all periods beginning before, on, or after Nov. 10, 1988, with no inference created as to existence or nonexistence or scope of any income tax exemption derived from fishing rights secured as of Mar. 17, 1988, by any treaty, law, or Executive order, see section 3044 of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as an Effective Date note under section 7873 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Short Title of 2022 Amendment
Pub. L. 117–317, §1, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4419, provided that: "This Act [repealing sections 72, 127 to 130, 137, 138, 273, 283, 285, and 302 of this title] may be cited as the 'Repealing Existing Substandard Provisions Encouraging Conciliation with Tribes Act' or the 'RESPECT Act'."
Short Title of 2000 Amendment
Pub. L. 106–179, §1, Mar. 14, 2000, 114 Stat. 46, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 81 and 476 of this title] may be cited as the 'Indian Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encouragement Act of 2000'."
Codification
R.S. §2079 derived from act Mar. 3, 1871, ch. 120, §1, 16 Stat. 566.
Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–647 inserted sentence at end relating to State tax treatment of income derived by Indians from exercise of fishing rights secured by treaties, Executive orders, or Acts of Congress.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–647 applicable to all periods beginning before, on, or after Nov. 10, 1988, with no inference created as to existence or nonexistence or scope of any income tax exemption derived from fishing rights secured as of Mar. 17, 1988, by any treaty, law, or Executive order, see section 3044 of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as an Effective Date note under section 7873 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Short Title of 2022 Amendment
Pub. L. 117–317, §1, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4419, provided that: "This Act [repealing sections 72, 127 to 130, 137, 138, 273, 283, 285, and 302 of this title] may be cited as the 'Repealing Existing Substandard Provisions Encouraging Conciliation with Tribes Act' or the 'RESPECT Act'."
Short Title of 2000 Amendment
Pub. L. 106–179, §1, Mar. 14, 2000, 114 Stat. 46, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 81 and 476 of this title] may be cited as the 'Indian Tribal Economic Development and Contract Encouragement Act of 2000'."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/71.