FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 14
Omitted
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Omitted
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
25 U.S.C. § 677i (Omitted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
406 U.S. 128 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Hackford v. Babbitt
14 F.3d 1457 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
Felter, Oranna v. Kempthorne, Dirk
473 F.3d 1255 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
Murdock v. Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray Reservation
975 F.2d 683 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Oranna Bumgarner Felter
752 F.2d 1505 (Tenth Circuit, 1985)
Ute Distribution Corporation, a Utah Corporation v. Ute Indian Tribe
149 F.3d 1260 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Ute Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior of the United States
584 F.3d 1275 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Felter
546 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Utah, 1982)
Murdock v. Ute Indian Tribe Of Uintah And Ouray Reservation
975 F.2d 683 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)
Hackford v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A.
521 F. Supp. 541 (D. Utah, 1981)
Affiliated Ute Citizens v. Ute Indian Tribe
22 F.3d 254 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah
935 F. Supp. 1473 (D. Utah, 1996)
Ute Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior of the United States
934 F. Supp. 1302 (D. Utah, 1996)
Maldonado v. Hodel
683 F. Supp. 1322 (D. Utah, 1988)
Ute Distribution Corp. v. Norton
43 F. App'x 272 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)
Ute Distribution Corp. v. United States
721 F. Supp. 1202 (D. Utah, 1989)
United States v. Murdock
919 F. Supp. 1534 (D. Utah, 1996)
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Ute Distribution Corp.
455 F. App'x 856 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
UTE Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior
624 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (D. Utah, 2008)
Ute Distribution v. Ute Indian Tribe
(Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §10, 68 Stat. 873; Pub. L. 87–698, Sept. 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 597, which related to division of assets between full and mixed-blood groups, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Codification
Section, act Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1009, §10, 68 Stat. 873; Pub. L. 87–698, Sept. 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 597, which related to division of assets between full and mixed-blood groups, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.