FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 14
Omitted
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Omitted
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
25 U.S.C. § 566 (Omitted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United States
97 Fed. Cl. 203 (Federal Claims, 2011)
Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians v. Babbitt
116 F. Supp. 2d 155 (District of Columbia, 2000)
United States v. Damien Zepeda
738 F.3d 201 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Hawkins v. Bernhardt
(District of Columbia, 2020)
Foreman v. Department of Revenue
18 Or. Tax 476 (Oregon Tax Court, 2005)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, Pub. L. 99–398, §2, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 849; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095, which related to restoration of Federal recognition, rights, and privileges to the tribe and tribe members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Pub. L. 99–398, §1, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 849, provided that Pub. L. 99–398, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Klamath Indian Tribe Restoration Act".
Codification
Section, Pub. L. 99–398, §2, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 849; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095, which related to restoration of Federal recognition, rights, and privileges to the tribe and tribe members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Short Title
Pub. L. 99–398, §1, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 849, provided that Pub. L. 99–398, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Klamath Indian Tribe Restoration Act".