FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 12
Rules and regulations governing operations; limitations on oil or gas leases
25 U.S.C. § 396d
Title25 — Indians
Chapter12 — LEASE, SALE, OR SURRENDER OF ALLOTTED OR UNALLOTTED LANDS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 396d (Rules and regulations governing operations; limitations on oil or gas leases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 396d.
Text
All operations under any oil, gas, or other mineral lease issued pursuant to the terms of sections 396a to 396g of this title or any other Act affecting restricted Indian lands shall be subject to the rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior. In the discretion of the said Secretary, any lease for oil or gas issued under the provisions of sections 396a to 396g of this title shall be made subject to the terms of any reasonable cooperative unit or other plan approved or prescribed by said Secretary prior or subsequent to the issuance of any such lease which involves the development or production of oil or gas from land covered by such lease.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co.
336 U.S. 342 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States
364 F.3d 1339 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Navajo Tribe of Indians
471 U.S. 195 (Supreme Court, 1985)
In Re Surface Mining Regulation Litigation
456 F. Supp. 1301 (District of Columbia, 1978)
Navajo Nation v. United States
46 Fed. Cl. 217 (Federal Claims, 2000)
Kenai Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Department of the Interior
522 F. Supp. 521 (D. Utah, 1981)
Navajo Nation v. United States
263 F.3d 1325 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Amax Land Company v. Quarterman, Cynthia
181 F.3d 1356 (D.C. Circuit, 1999)
Yoder v. Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation
339 F.2d 360 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
San Xavier Development Authority v. Susan Charles, A.K.A. Susan Charet D.B.A. Desert Sands Mobile Home Sales and Service
237 F.3d 1149 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Chuska Energy Company v. Mobil Exploration & Producing North America, Inc., (Substituting for the Superior Oil Company)
854 F.2d 727 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Kenai Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Department of the Interior
671 F.2d 383 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
Superior Oil Co. v. Merritt
619 F. Supp. 526 (D. Utah, 1985)
Kenai Oil And Gas, Inc. v. U.S. Department Of The Interior
671 F.2d 383 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
Woods Petroleum Corp. v. Department of Interior
47 F.3d 1032 (Tenth Circuit, 1995)
Sanguine, Ltd. v. United States Department of the Interior
736 F.2d 1416 (Tenth Circuit, 1984)
Samedan Oil Corp. v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.
466 F. Supp. 521 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1978)
Rainbow Resources, Inc. v. Calf Looking
521 F. Supp. 682 (D. Montana, 1981)
Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes v. United States
33 Fed. Cl. 464 (Federal Claims, 1995)
Superior Oil Co. v. United States
605 F. Supp. 674 (D. Utah, 1985)
Source Credit
History
(May 11, 1938, ch. 198, §4, 52 Stat. 348.)
Editorial Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Repeal of Inconsistent Acts
For repeal of inconsistent acts, see section 7 of act May 11, 1938, set out as a note under section 396a of this title.
Repeal of Inconsistent Acts
For repeal of inconsistent acts, see section 7 of act May 11, 1938, set out as a note under section 396a of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 396d, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/396d.