FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 9

Patents in fee to allottees

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 25Indians·Ch. 9 — ALLOTMENT OF INDIAN LANDS
At the expiration of the trust period and when the lands have been conveyed to the Indians by patent in fee, as provided in section 348 of this title, then each and every allottee shall have the benefit of and be subject to the laws, both civil and criminal, of the State or Territory in which they may reside; and no Territory shall pass or enforce any law denying any such Indian within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law: Provided, That the Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion, and he is authorized, whenever he shall be satisfied that any Indian allottee is competent and capable of managing his or her affairs at any time to cause to be issued to such allottee a patent in fee simple, and thereafter all restrictions as to sale, incumbrance, or taxation of said land s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 U.S.C. § 349 (Patents in fee to allottees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation
502 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1992)
320 case citations
Squire v. Capoeman
351 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1956)
300 case citations
Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.
554 U.S. 316 (Supreme Court, 2008)
228 case citations
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
211 F.3d 1280 (D.C. Circuit, 2000)
67 case citations
Horton Capoeman v. The United States
440 F.2d 1002 (Court of Claims, 1971)
39 case citations
Mitchell v. United States
591 F.2d 1300 (Court of Claims, 1979)
21 case citations
Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton
460 F. Supp. 1320 (E.D. Washington, 1978)
17 case citations
Agua Caliente Band of Mission Indians' Tribal Council v. City of Palm Springs
347 F. Supp. 42 (C.D. California, 1972)
14 case citations
White Earth Band of Chippewa Indians v. Alexander
683 F.2d 1129 (Eighth Circuit, 1982)
13 case citations
Nichols v. Rysavy
610 F. Supp. 1245 (D. South Dakota, 1985)
10 case citations
In Re Kaul for Relief From a Tax Grievance
4 P.3d 1170 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2000)
9 case citations
Helen S. Kirschling v. United States
746 F.2d 512 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
7 case citations
Quinault Indian Nation v. Grays Harbor County
310 F.3d 645 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
6 case citations
United States ex rel. Saginaw Chippewa Tribe v. Michigan
882 F. Supp. 659 (E.D. Michigan, 1995)
4 case citations
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Matt Gaffey
188 F.3d 1010 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
4 case citations
Bordeaux v. Hunt
621 F. Supp. 637 (D. South Dakota, 1985)
3 case citations
Lac Courte Oreilles Band of L v. Tony Evers
46 F.4th 552 (Seventh Circuit, 2022)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, §6, 24 Stat. 390; May 8, 1906, ch. 2348, 34 Stat. 182.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This Act, referred to in text, is act Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, 24 Stat. 388, and is popularly known as the Indian General Allotment Act. For classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 331 of this title and Tables.

Codification
Provisions relating to the grant of citizenship to certain Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States were omitted in view of act June 2, 1924, ch. 233, 43 Stat. 253, which granted citizenship to all non-citizen Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States. See section 1401 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.