FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 8
Rights-of-way for railway, telegraph, and telephone lines; town-site stations
25 U.S.C. § 312
Title25 — Indians
Chapter8 — RIGHTS-OF-WAY THROUGH INDIAN LANDS
This text of 25 U.S.C. § 312 (Rights-of-way for railway, telegraph, and telephone lines; town-site stations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 312.
Text
A right of way for a railway, telegraph, and telephone line through any Indian reservation in any State or Territory, except Oklahoma, or through any lands reserved for an Indian agency or for other purposes in connection with the Indian service, or through any lands which have been allotted in severalty to any individual Indian under any law or treaty, but which have not been conveyed to the allottee with full power of alienation, is granted to any railroad company organized under the laws of the United States, or of any State or Territory, which shall comply with the provisions of sections 312 to 318 of this title and such rules and regulations as may be prescribed thereunder: Provided, That no right of way shall be granted under said sections until the Secretary of the Interior is satis
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana
472 U.S. 237 (Supreme Court, 1985)
United States v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
543 F.2d 676 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Plains Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc. v. Pueblo of Laguna and United States of America
542 F.2d 1375 (Tenth Circuit, 1976)
Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Bnsf Railway Company
951 F.3d 1142 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Watt
700 F.2d 550 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
Sand Springs Home v. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways
1975 OK 33 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1975)
E. G. Fitzgerald v. City of Ardmore, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation, Willie Mae Lane v. City of Ardmore, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation
281 F.2d 717 (Tenth Circuit, 1960)
Nebraska Public Power District v. 100.95 Acres of Land
540 F. Supp. 592 (D. Nebraska, 1982)
United States v. Joseph Joshua Jackson
697 F.3d 670 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
New Mexico Navajo Ranchers Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce Commission
850 F.2d 729 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Burlington Northern Railroad v. Fort Peck Tribal Executive Board
701 F. Supp. 1493 (D. Montana, 1988)
Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. BNSF Railway Co.
228 F. Supp. 3d 1171 (W.D. Washington, 2017)
Capurro v. United States
2 Cl. Ct. 722 (Court of Claims, 1983)
Estate of Jorgenson v. DHS Drilling Co.
11 Am. Tribal Law 123 (Shoshone and Arapaho Tribal Court, 2011)
Source Credit
History
(Mar. 2, 1899, ch. 374, §1, 30 Stat. 990; Feb. 28, 1902, ch. 134, §23, 32 Stat. 50; June 25, 1910, ch. 431, §16, 36 Stat. 859.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/312.