FEDERAL · 25 U.S.C. · Chapter 29

Declaration of policy

25 U.S.C. § 2702
Title25Indians
Chapter29 — INDIAN GAMING REGULATION

This text of 25 U.S.C. § 2702 (Declaration of policy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
25 U.S.C. § 2702.

Text

The purpose of this chapter is—

(1)to provide a statutory basis for the operation of gaming by Indian tribes as a means of promoting tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong tribal governments;
(2)to provide a statutory basis for the regulation of gaming by an Indian tribe adequate to shield it from organized crime and other corrupting influences, to ensure that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming operation, and to assure that gaming is conducted fairly and honestly by both the operator and players; and
(3)to declare that the establishment of independent Federal regulatory authority for gaming on Indian lands, the establishment of Federal standards for gaming on Indian lands, and the establishment of a National Indian Gaming Commission are necessar

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community
134 S. Ct. 2024 (Supreme Court, 2014)
465 case citations
Texas v. United States
497 F.3d 491 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
135 case citations
Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation
512 F.3d 921 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
113 case citations
Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Doyle
2006 WI 107 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2006)
81 case citations
Panzer v. Doyle
2004 WI 52 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2004)
56 case citations
Cossey v. Cherokee Nation Enterprises, LLC
2009 OK 6 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)
35 case citations
City of Roseville v. Norton
219 F. Supp. 2d 130 (District of Columbia, 2002)
29 case citations
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Granholm
475 F.3d 805 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)
23 case citations
Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. Chaudhuri
802 F.3d 267 (Second Circuit, 2015)
19 case citations
McCRACKEN AND AMICK, INC. v. Perdue
687 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
14 case citations
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Michigan
5 F.3d 147 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)
13 case citations
Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma
37 F.3d 1422 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
11 case citations
Stand up for California v. State of Cal.
6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)
9 case citations
Calvello v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
1998 SD 107 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1998)
9 case citations
MacHal, Inc. v. Jena Band of Choctaw Indians
387 F. Supp. 2d 659 (W.D. Louisiana, 2005)
8 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 100–497, §3, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2467.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 100–497, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2467, known as the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2701 of this title and Tables.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 U.S.C. § 2702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/25/2702.